Le Jan 4, 2012 à 11:47 AM, Peter Hartmann a écrit :
> On 01/03/2012 01:07 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 3 de January de 2012 09.53.41, Jonas M. Gastal wrote:
>>> As for removing them entirely yes, it would require changes in the HTTP
>>> socket engine and QAuthenticator. But give
On 01/03/2012 01:07 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 de January de 2012 09.53.41, Jonas M. Gastal wrote:
>> As for removing them entirely yes, it would require changes in the HTTP
>> socket engine and QAuthenticator. But given that both of them use
>> QHttpResponseHeader I see no rea
On Tuesday, 3 de January de 2012 09.53.41, Jonas M. Gastal wrote:
> As for removing them entirely yes, it would require changes in the HTTP
> socket engine and QAuthenticator. But given that both of them use
> QHttpResponseHeader I see no reason to duplicate the code in both classes,
> perphaps it
On Tuesday 03 January 2012 12:33:36 Peter Hartmann wrote:
> I also like first making the parts still in use private; getting rid of
> it completely is a bigger task, as it requires rewriting parts of the
> HTTP socket engine and QAuthenticator IIRC.
>
> Peter
>
> _
On 12/26/2011 11:08 AM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> (...)
>> I'd say, move that class in qhttpheader_p.h
>
> Yes, let's make it private (or get rid of it if possible). For those that
> need/use QHttpHeader (and/or QHttp), we can provide the code as a small
> static library that you can includ
On 12/23/11 3:39 PM, "ext Olivier Goffart" wrote:
>On Friday 23 December 2011 09:42:47 Jonas M. Gastal wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have just sent to gerrit a patch which removes QHttp from Qt:
>> http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,11741
>>
>> However I have not removed QHttpHeader and frie
On Friday 23 December 2011 09:42:47 Jonas M. Gastal wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just sent to gerrit a patch which removes QHttp from Qt:
> http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,11741
>
> However I have not removed QHttpHeader and friends, so they're still public
> and in the QHttp header, I'm
On Friday 23 December 2011 11:06:53 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 23 de December de 2011 10.41.43, Jonas M. Gastal wrote:
> > QNAM is not meant to be used in creating a server, it is strictly for
> > clients.
> >
> > >From what I know there are no classes to help in creating an HTTP
> > >ser
On Friday, 23 de December de 2011 10.41.43, Jonas M. Gastal wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2011 12:23:14 Alex Kides wrote:
> > Is there an equivalent means of processing http requests/responses when
> > working with a QTcpServer/QTcpSocket? (The QHttp*Header classes have been
> > marked as obsolete
On Friday 23 December 2011 12:23:14 Alex Kides wrote:
> Is there an equivalent means of processing http requests/responses when
> working with a QTcpServer/QTcpSocket? (The QHttp*Header classes have been
> marked as obsolete but no usable equivalent is in place, that i've seen
> anyway, the QNAM cl
1:42 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] QHttp removal
Hey all,
I have just sent to gerrit a patch which removes QHttp from Qt:
http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,11741
However I have not removed QHttpHeader and friends, so they're still public
and in the QHttp header, I&#x
Hey all,
I have just sent to gerrit a patch which removes QHttp from Qt:
http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,11741
However I have not removed QHttpHeader and friends, so they're still public
and in the QHttp header, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to make that
stuff private. That A
12 matches
Mail list logo
