On 12/23/11 3:39 PM, "ext Olivier Goffart" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Friday 23 December 2011 09:42:47 Jonas M. Gastal wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I have just sent to gerrit a patch which removes QHttp from Qt: >> http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,11741 >> >> However I have not removed QHttpHeader and friends, so they're still >>public >> and in the QHttp header, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to make >>that >> stuff private. That API was used in conjunction with QHttp, QNAM doesn't >> require it(in its public API). >> >> We could also consider removing the QHttpHeader* classes entirely but >>that >> would entail rewriting all uses of it, there currently are a several. >> >> What does everyone think about that? > >I'd say, move that class in qhttpheader_p.h Yes, let's make it private (or get rid of it if possible). For those that need/use QHttpHeader (and/or QHttp), we can provide the code as a small static library that you can include in your code base. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
