+1
On 23/10/24 17:31, Lars Knoll via Development wrote:
Hi everybody,
Over the last year, I found that I do not have the time that is required as a
maintainer of Qt Multimedia.
Artem Dyomin has been taking over more and more of that work from me over the
last two years, becoming the de-facto
Hi-
On 8/10/24 09:41, Ilya Fedin wrote:
Well, I told my experience. I was also asking another person who
is trying to contribute Qt, too, about his expereince, he said he also
can't get reviews in reasonable times. IIRC he has has too around 10
open changes and most of them are open for a long t
+1!
On 22/12/2022 12:21 am, Morten Sørvig via Development wrote:
Hi,
I’d like to nominate Mikołaj Boć as an approver for the Qt project.
Mikołaj joined the Qt Company earlier this year and hit the ground
running. He has contributed features and many bug fixes for the Qt for
WebAssembly plat
Hi,
I believe that would be a bug, as I checked on Linux and Wave is listed
in supported codecs.
It would have a better chance of being fixed If you could report it here:
https://bugreports.qt.io
On 20/12/2022 5:56 pm, rynn.chen wrote:
Hello,
I created an application with Qt6.2.4 on win 1
+1 !!
On 29/11/2022 11:55 pm, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote:
Hi,
Kurt Pattyn is currently listed as the Maintainer fo Qt WebSocket. However, he
has not responded to emails I sent him over the last few months. In the middle
of October I informed him that I will remove him as maintai
On 27/9/2022 9:28 pm, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
Please stop announcing this kind of updates through the development
mailing list!
Please do *not* stop sending releasing information emails on this list.
I kinda like knowing about them.
Release information, regardless of open source or commerci
Governance of Qt going forward.
+1
--
Lorn Potter
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
many unbelievable products now!
Congrats on the new digs! I am sure we will be hearing more about it in
the future.
Thanks again!
--
Lorn Potter
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
+1
On 21/4/2022 10:00 PM, Morten Sørvig wrote:
I'd like to nominate David Skoland as approver for the Qt Project.
David is employed by the Qt company has been contributing to Qt since
late 2020, with patches and reviews to several modules. He has recently
shifted focus to work on Qt for WebAs
On 19/1/2022 1:01 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
For Qt 6.4, I'd like to propose we change the way we detect and enable SIMD
support. TL;DR:
[snip]
On a side track. Not knowing too much regarding simd, what would be the
best benchmarks to get a comparison of Qt WebAssembly simd support vs.
no
On 21/1/2022 6:10 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday, 20 January 2022 11:22:19 PST Lorn Potter wrote:
It's like Jean-Michael says, 32 bit, but it's complicated.
Yeah, I can get that :)
From what I've understood so far, WASM is not __x86_64__ but it might be
__i386__.
On 20/1/2022 1:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 20:56:10 PST Lorn Potter wrote:
wasm is a special case, as we turn it off by default, regardless of
detection. We cannot allow detection by default (specified by some
configure argument which is currently -sse2) because
once it is
compiled in.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lis
; procedure? Or some way to
discover if the system has been gamed or hacked in some way. 3rd party
overseers or somesuch thing?
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded D
moves the main() function to a thread to leave
the main browser thread to do other things so it never blocks.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Develo
Thanks for simplifying that API!
On 26/5/21 10:09 PM, Lars Knoll wrote:
NX support is missing right now, and is planned after 6.2.
As well, a webassembly backend is being contributed based on openAL, for
6.3...
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtmultimedia/+/349515
--
Lorn Potter
where!
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/lis
LTS branch is.
Technically, I would say a set of diff patches is a fork. After all, git
is just a glorified set of patches.
I see nothing wrong with a fork. Unless it's a spork, then it's
completely wrong.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Main
On 13/5/21 8:00 PM, Kevin Kofler via Development wrote:
KDE is maintaining their own 5.15 branches, e.g.:
https://invent.kde.org/qt/qt/qtbase/-/commits/kde/5.15
I'm not kde developer, but I am sure kde has almost always had their own
fork of Qt.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Deve
open source and free.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt
me, the bigger picture is that if it furthers/funds the development
of the open source product, then I am ok with
helping the closed source side.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embed
t want
to know what was done to qmake to get it to build qtopia. :)
We have a huge elephant in the room which nobody want to see it...
I guess it's a choice of an elephant or a whale.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author,
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt
Hi *,
On the road to Qt 6, we must remember our past:
What better way than to have a short break to listen to this worldwide
hit - The Qt 4 Dance!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbTEVbQLC8s
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
itial cmake call.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
tches.
Greetings!
Mike Gabriel (aka sunweaver at debian.org <http://debian.org>)
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
nt mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
__
lopment mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Deve
o get basic functionality. On par for the serialnmea plugin.
Thanks in advance,
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Develo
#x27;In-Review' bugs to
find interesting bugs that need review.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
___
Development maili
prompt me to go back and start over, I'll also want to be
able to go back to the "In Progress" state from it.
+1
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on M
WebAssembly platform into a more
viable option for Qt multi platform applications.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author, Hands-on Mobile and Embedded Development with Qt 5
Thanks for an interesting job as both software engineer and technical writer.
Good luck to ya! Thanks for great docs! It was a pleasure working
alongside you in the Brissie office.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Maintainer
QtSensors
Author
k you.
--
Alex
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Platform Maintainer Qt WebAssembly, Mainta
rst, but I recommend aiming for full threading.
Actually, QtWebAssembly platform is a supported platform and default is
nothread. :) What is not tested is nothread on a different platform like
desktop.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt W
e.
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-63925
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
statically linked as Qt WebAssembly is statically linked. dlopen is
dependent upon main and side module support for dynamic linking.
See https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-63925?filter=19272
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
orelib/global/qglobal.h:121:49:
note: expanded
from macro 'Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X'
# define Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X(Condition, Message) static_assert(bool(Condition),
Message)
^ ~~~
1 error generated.
+1
On 17/5/19 12:45 AM, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
I’d like to nominate Mikhail Svetkin for Approver status.
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https
On 2/4/19 11:14 pm, Laszlo Agocs wrote:
As discussed at https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Graphics_Vision_2020 Qt 6
will do away with the hard OpenGL dependency in most, if not all, of its
modules. This is achieved via a small abstraction layer, currently
called the Qt Rendering Hardware Interface,
ects using Qt ?
Uwe
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Lorn Potter
Freelance Qt Developer. Maintainer QtSensors, Qt WebAssembly
___
Development mailing
On 25/10/18 9:19 am, Konstantin Shegunov wrote:
Addendum: There's too much vague phrasing. When I was reading through
the text I read things of the sort:
"Showing empathy towards other community members"
and
"Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
professional
On 03/14/2018 07:54 PM, Morten Sørvig wrote:
>
>> On 9 Mar 2018, at 13:57, Morten Sørvig wrote:
>>
>> * (No) thread support
>>
>> Wasm and Emscripten do have pthreads support. However this requires
>> SharedArrayBuffer,
>> which has been disabled in all major browser after recent security
On 03/12/2018 11:42 PM, Jason H wrote:
> 1. True ActiveX was extremely limiting, NaCL less so, Emscripten/asm.js less
> so. I can't really argue much difference between WebAssembly and asm.js
> though, given asm.js's previous performance claims.
In my experience WebAssembly is much more perfor
Hi, I would like to add...
One of the guys over at https://qtmob.slack.com keeps a demonstration of
the Qt examples for Qt Webassembly (thanks David!):
https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/wasm-qt-examples/last/index.html
Not all of the examples work, and not all of them work correctly.
Firefox
f Qt for WebAssembly
>> (http://webassembly.org)
>>
> how does this relate to this effort? https://codereview.qt-project.org/178543
>
It is continuing and refining that code line.
-
Lorn Potter
Developer, Maintainer QtSensors/QtSystemInfo
___
come up with technical reasons the new c++11 member
initialization is better than what is there now, I’d rather keep it the same as
it is now.
-
Lorn Potter
Developer, Maintainer QtSensors/QtSystemInfo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 08/25/2017 02:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> [🎵 "First there was Linux / and then there was Mac / now with Windows / on
> the
> Open Source track" 🎵 anyone?]
ahh yes. The all time dance mega hit: Qt 4 Dance!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbTEVbQLC8s
> On 25 Aug 2017, at 7:00 am, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> My criticism is what I *don't* see in this: local communication. Cloud
> communication *should* be secondary in IoT. In fact, few devices should
> communicate with the Cloud, hopefully only those that have hardened security
> and where
> On 1 Aug 2017, at 10:44 pm, Kai Koehne wrote:
>
> I'd like to remind everyone about our commit policy:
> https://wiki.qt.io/Review_Policy . In particular, it says 'Give reviewers
> ample time to respond', which is assumed to be a full working day minimum
> (preferably two days).
>
> That
On 23/7/17 3:43 am, Phil Bouchard wrote:
Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote:
over C++ ??
No it's much faster than the Javascript -> JIT flow.
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
On 07/22/2017 05:52 AM, Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote:
Phil,
Can you please explain benefits of having C++
> On 21 Jul 2017, at 2:22 pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>
>
> So I would like to know if Qt thinks what I am proposing (BB++ -> C++ ->
> WebAssembly) is a good plan.
What does this have to do with Qt?
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.
On 06/06/2017 12:20 AM, Jason H wrote:
>
>
>> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 at 12:34 AM
>> From: "Lorn Potter"
>> To: development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 06/05/2017 07:00 A
On 06/05/2017 07:00 AM, Jason H wrote:
> While Qt is not a web framework, over time there have been efforts to use it
> on the web (outlined below).
>
> Given that Chrome is dropping NaCL
> (http://www.tomshardware.com/news/chrome-deprecates-pnacl-embraces-webassembly,34583.html)
> and the We
On 18/10/16 13:03, Fredrik de Vibe wrote:
> As by now 15 days (and more) have passed since the announcement, it is
> now final. Timur is now the maintainer of Qt Network and Jesús is the
> maintainer of Qt NetworkAuth. The wiki has been updated.
Congrats guys! :)
Looking forward to working with
Thanks for that.
On Wednesday, 10 August 2016 11:35:06 PM AEST Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> yours has 41 lines and the reference only 38
> http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/header.LGPL?h=dev
Ok, so how to deal with files that have multiple copyright holders?
--
Software Engineer
System Enab
Hello,
Is there someone who has a script for updating license headers that can
release this, or make it known? Or, alternatively, update the license
headers or make the license test not run on non supported modules for
integrations?
Trying to upstream some stuff:
Module "qt/qtsystems" (a1509631b0
On 08/03/16 01:13, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
I'd like to propose Shawn Rutledge as maintainer for Qt Quick.
+1
--
Software Engineer
Hardware Enablement
Canonical Ltd
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/
On 23/01/16 04:37, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
As I said, exceptions are like*a life vest*, they should be used *only in
>critical situations* not everywhere.
>
Using them anywhere, can break code everywhere as the number of return points
and code paths immediately becomes near infinite. They
On 22/01/16 18:52, Hausmann Simon wrote:
I'm of the opinion that our mission should be to make life easier for
programmers.
I think this has always been the main mission for Qt.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.
On 15/07/15 00:37, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to nominate plfiorini for Approver status.
>
> He's been quite helpful in working on Wayland (client & compositor) side
> things in conjunction with the Hawaii desktop (http://hawaiios.org/),
> and offering review on related patches.
On 16/06/2015 6:49 pm, Koehne Kai wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt-
>> [...]
>> If you ask my opinion, 'errorOccurred' sounds like a sensible name.
>
> I concur that errorOccurred() is the most sensible choice.
+1
--
Lorn 'ljp
On 14/06/2015 1:01 pm, Alan Alpert wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>> On 11/06/2015 12:36 am, Samuel Gaist wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> failed doesn't always mean there was an error with a direct relation.
>>
>>
On 11/06/2015 12:36 am, Samuel Gaist wrote:
>
> failed doesn't always mean there was an error with a direct relation.
I was going to say this, but you beat me to it.
Also, "errored" is just wrong, "error" is also past tense.
--
Lorn 'ljp' Potter
Software Engineer, llornkcor technologies / Jo
On 09/06/15 21:59, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
[snip]
Is there a url to see the test results of various platforms/modules?
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> On 25 Feb 2015, at 7:20 am, Robin Burchell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since nobody else has replied to this yet, my understanding of what
> happened with license checks is roughly as follows. I was not
> involved, so YMMV - this is all just gained from observation of what's
> happened - someone else
Hi,
I just noticed that the Qt Submodule Update Bot emails still have a reply-to
email of: qt_submodule_update_...@ovi.com
Seeing as ovi.com was Nokia's thing, I just wanted to make sure this was the
correct and current email address for that.
___
Deve
This change removes the QtSystemInfo QStorage
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/95730/
On 3 Oct 2014, at 8:46 pm, Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> I just pulled Qt and then it wouldn't build. After investigating a bit, I
> found this:
> ~/qt5 (5.4)$ find . -name qstorageinfo.h
> ./qtsystems/src/sy
On 24 Sep 2014, at 3:57 pm, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
> I wonder if the"int interface" indexed API is tedious to use. Say you do
> manage to get a QNetworkInterface object from QtNetwork, then before you can
> call for example
>
>QString imsi(int interface) const;
>
> you have to retrieve
Hi *,
While looking into a bug https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-41283
It reminded me that I am not happy with NetworkInfo since it got ported from
QtMobility to Qt 5.
*Note* QSystemInfo is not officially supported API.
Since I am maintainer for it and it's not "released", I am g
On 18/09/14 05:09, Kuba Ober wrote:
> One of the reasons I loath to recommend to the management to go back to
> paying for Qt licenses is that we’d have been sponsoring what amounts to 2 or
> 3 major rebrandings and “revamps”, and it seems like throwing money down the
> drain. As a user, I wan
On 18/09/14 06:25, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 17/09/14 22:17, "Knoll Lars" wrote:
>
> Adding to myself: But I agree that downloading to a phone doesn't make too
> much sense, and we should probably detect that you look at the site from a
> mobile device. That part sounds like a plain old bug.
I kno
On 27/08/2014 9:56 pm, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> Den 27-08-2014 10:40, Knoll Lars skrev:
>> On 26/08/14 21:00, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:58:41 Kuba Ober wrote:
> Unless we want to make this a tri-state: definitely local, definitely
> remote, could be either.
>>
On 27/06/2014 11:14 am, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I've just counted: I have 203 pending reviews for me. At least half of them
> haven't been updated in six months. Some of them are for the old master and
> api_changes branches and will never, ever be accepted unless resubmitted.
>
> Last we discusse
On 12/06/2014 8:49 am, Richard Moore wrote:
> The notes from the network session are online at
> http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2014/wiki/QtCS14QtNetwork
> for those who couldn't attend (or those who did but can't remember what
> we said). Thanks to Danimo for minuting this.
D
Hi Kurt,
On 22/03/2014 9:36 pm, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason why math3d is in the QtGUI module on not in the QtCore
> module?
I agree it should have been moved to QtCore.
As I remember the discussions, they involved use cases, and more people
thought the strongest use case
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
hope to have a good understanding of how we'd like to proceed with these
> modules within a few weeks from now, and when and how we can bring these
> modules back as an integral part of Qt 5.x.
Good news here.
As maintainer of qsysteminfo, please try and include me in any
discussions r
he diff
> minimization philosophy, i also feel quite a dislike for excess braces.
> adding to that the in this case pretty persuasive consideration of the
> status quo, i'd like this discussion to die. NOW.
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@
; enough to apply to the case of braces in single-line ifs.
I have preferred and written always using braces.
These were always meant as guidelines not hard rules.
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
tested. in production.
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.o
On 02/03/13 07:59, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sábado, 2 de março de 2013 07.51.04, Lorn Potter wrote:
>>> Wasn't there already similar functionality in QtMobility?
>>> QSystemStorageInfo seems to provide similar functionality?
>>
>> Yes it does.
>>
>> Thanks for your efforts so far!
>>
>> André
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
for your efforts so far!
>
> André
>
>
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
ionality in QtMobility?
>> QSystemStorageInfo seems to provide similar functionality? Or did all
>> that get scrapped in Qt 5?
>>
>> André
>>
>
> _______
> Development mailing list
> Deve
eInfo seems to provide similar functionality?
Yes it does.
> Or did all
> that get scrapped in Qt 5?
It's there in qtsystems, which is a hidden module.
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 18/02/13 16:01, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Monday, February 18, 2013 05:07:42 Lorn Potter wrote:
>> On 15/02/13 20:43, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>> I don't know why you're packaging those.
>>>
>>> You understand that they are not 'part of Qt 5&#
g the
> Qt to a wider audience. I guess it can be considered as a good thing :)
> and never know somebody might get excited and interested to contribute
> and push forward the modules left out from the release.
I would agree here too.
Making the unloved modules invisible is
gt; And you understand that they are not stable in any way and their API will
> likely change, and they will not be part of Qt 5.1, and they may never be part
> of a Qt release?
They are stable. Some of them even have active maintainers.
>
> Thanks,
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Softwa
with the TZ file not having
> translations, but on Mac there is no reason to use ICU as the Mac
> classes already wrap ICU and are easier to use.
>
> Cheers!
>
> John.
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/de
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
t;
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 8:46 PM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I just noticed all the QtMobility bugs list satu makela as the lead for
>> all components.
>> Since when did this happen? I saw no email announcing this change. As
>> far as I know, I did not
be listed as the lead for
sensors and systeminformation (same as for Qt5), so bugs will be
assigned to the proper maintainer.
--
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
___
Development mailing list
On 11/12/2012, at 1:25 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> APIs likely to come in later. So if we had an import QtAddons 5.0 it
> could look like this:
>
> import Qt3d 2.0
> import QtSensors 5.0
> import QtMobility.sensors 1.3
FYI QtMobility.sensors has been
On 29/11/2012, at 6:05 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:31 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 29/11/2012, at 5:47 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>
>>> If maintainers for other repositories would like to get the same branches
>>> set
; system and a big thanks goes to them already now.
Why not just do this as default, so all modules workflow are similar?
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
htt
s that were
removed?
Lorn Potter
Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 20/11/2012, at 6:20 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Hi Lorn,
>
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 20/11/2012, at 6:09 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The beta2 is a very good milestone towards Qt 5. We now have packag
ng to maintain them, but
please, there are a few modules that got removed that _do_ have active
maintainers, just not Digia ones. QConnectivity, QSensors and QSystems for
example.
Isn't BB10 supposed to become a Tier 1 platform? QSensors are a part of BB10.
Lorn Potter
Senior Software
with qt5.git
Thanks for the heads up.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Sergio Ahumada
> Quality Engineer - Digia, Qt
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
>
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
