> On 25 Aug 2017, at 7:00 am, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > > My criticism is what I *don't* see in this: local communication. Cloud > communication *should* be secondary in IoT. In fact, few devices should > communicate with the Cloud, hopefully only those that have hardened security > and where the user can control the privacy settings on. In a given smart > home, > you should be able to count how many of those exist in the fingers of one > hand. > > So where's the information about local network discovery and communication? > Where's the strategy on common protocols and data models? Publish and > subscribe of notifications?
I would agree. QtMqtt is interesting along these lines. IoT is really about communication and interactions. See this: https://medium.com/web11/iot-isnt-about-smart-things-it-s-about-smart-interactions-a80546fcd9b7 _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
