How was this made?
http://wiki.qt-project.org/images/9/9c/OpenGovernance-Qt.png
I would like to add QtWeb and its QtFCGI subproject to it, since those have
been decided to be added on once we have a basic FCGI system going.
___
Development mailing list
D
So, as far as I see it, we will not be needing the Filter, or Access Control
mechanisms for FCGI (at least to begin with), what do you guys say?
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote:
> I also agree. Javascript just never occurred to me...
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 201
I also agree. Javascript just never occurred to me...
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Mark Constable wrote:
> On 2011-10-25 11:32 PM, Gábor Lehel wrote:
> > > Lastly, ties to a scripting language would be excellent, and it
> > > would be great if we could start with Lua since it is dead simple
is on fcgi but I have a
> qt-based http server I'd be happy to contribute:
>
>
> http://opensource.bolloretelecom.eu/projects/qdjango/browser/src/QDjangoHttpServer.h
>
> Am at qtdd11 if you want to talk.
>
> --
> Jeremy
> On 25/10/11 04:38 Dhaivat Pandya wrote:
>
&
QtWeb: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb
Web framework for Qt, right now, all we have decided is the FastCGI base.
Either it can be a Wt style framework with Qt components, or, a more
traditional MVC framework (more community support on the latter, so that is
mostly likely the POA).
Fork, commit
Okay, I'll be starting a new thread, and, as far as I know, QtWeb is not
taken.
Go ahead and fork the repo, I'll pull in any changes you have.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Mark Constable wrote:
> On 2011-10-24 05:55 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote:
> > So, no matter how
start to have a coherent
> package ?
>
>
> Le 22/10/2011 19:11, Pau Garcia i Quiles a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Have you ever used Wt?
>
> It does everything you say it's difficult.
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Dhaivat Pandya
> wrote:
>
>>
