Okay, I'll be starting a new thread, and, as far as I know, QtWeb is not taken.
Go ahead and fork the repo, I'll pull in any changes you have. On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Mark Constable <ma...@renta.net> wrote: > On 2011-10-24 05:55 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote: > > So, no matter how we look at this, we obviously need: > > > > 1) FastCGI support > > There maybe some clues here if you are not aware of it... > > https://github.com/fredemmott/fastcgiqt > > > 2) A web server that supports async > > With lighttpd and nginx as examples but unfortunately not in C++. > > > So, we might as well get cracking. > > I set up a Gitorious repo here: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb > > Excellent. > > > For the lack of a better name, we'll be calling it QtWeb, if you come > > up with a better name that most people like, we can change it. > > Seems perfect if not otherwise already taken. Perhaps start a new > thread with QtWeb as the Subject. > > > So, if you are interested in contributing, please tell me, so we can > > have an initial set of contributors. > > Please sign me up. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
