Hey Juan,
That certainly looks interesting. Are you aware of the Qt OpcUA module?
https://github.com/qt/qtopcua
Right now it focusses on the client side, but long term servers might become
more important for us. Especially the gateway scenario of converting classic
and proprietrary protocols to
11.04.2019, 04:05, "Richard Weickelt" :
> On 10.04.2019 23:21, Marco Bubke wrote:
>> Sounds you want flatpak. ;-)
>
> All those run-time extracted application container formats might be nice
> solutions for GUI applications which is apparently the main target of Qt.
> But my observation is that
On 10.04.2019 23:21, Marco Bubke wrote:
> Sounds you want flatpak. ;-)
All those run-time extracted application container formats might be nice
solutions for GUI applications which is apparently the main target of Qt.
But my observation is that they perform rather poorly when being used for
comman
> You may need to do custom steps on artifacts produced by windeployqt before
> packing them, so it's better to have separate tools for "bundling" and
> creation
> of actual packages.
Well, that's easily solved. The "tool" doesn't need to do everything on a
single invocation which leaves enough
Sounds you want flatpak. ;-)
On April 10, 2019 21:43:31 Richard Weickelt wrote:
>>> I, as a person, think that a "deployment tool for Linux" is
>>> something that spits out packages in half a dozen "native"
>>> distribution package formats.
>>
>> Nope, that tool is called "package maintainer" :)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:44:45PM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 10.04.2019, 21:38, "André Pönitz" :
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:13:01AM +, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> >> What do people think about having a deployment tool for Linux?
> >
> > I, as a person, think that a "deployment tool for
10.04.2019, 23:09, "Konstantin Tokarev" :
> 10.04.2019, 22:43, "Richard Weickelt" :
>> I would be interested to know how easy it is to release a
>> Qt-based application with a bleeding edge Qt version (or with a patched one)
>> to the official Debian repositories.
>
> The only possible way to
10.04.2019, 22:43, "Richard Weickelt" :
> I would be interested to know how easy it is to release a
> Qt-based application with a bleeding edge Qt version (or with a patched one)
> to the official Debian repositories.
The only possible way to add package to the official Debian repositories is
d
10.04.2019, 22:43, "Richard Weickelt" :
> Nothing stops me from publishing a self-containing .deb, .rpm, .whatever on
> my website. If there was a one stop shop tool that produces a collection
> like this with very little effort: https://speedcrunch.org/download.html I
> would be sold. Maybe even
> Since its company-internal, the answer likely doesn't matter to you. But it
> doesn't have CI. If a repository is worth having CI for, it should go to
> Gerrit.
>
Thanks for replying anyway. Interesting.
I was looking for a (semi-)open and maintainable CI solution that I could
propose for Qb
>> I, as a person, think that a "deployment tool for Linux" is
>> something that spits out packages in half a dozen "native"
>> distribution package formats.
>
> Nope, that tool is called "package maintainer" :)
Blessed be those who have a "package maintainer". I don'ẗ think it's that
easy. If I
10.04.2019, 21:38, "André Pönitz" :
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:13:01AM +, Mitch Curtis wrote:
>> What do people think about having a deployment tool for Linux?
>
> I, as a person, think that a "deployment tool for Linux" is
> something that spits out packages in half a dozen "native"
> dis
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:13:01AM +, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> What do people think about having a deployment tool for Linux?
I, as a person, think that a "deployment tool for Linux" is
something that spits out packages in half a dozen "native"
distribution package formats.
Collecting "resource
Hi guys,
This is pretty much WIP, but I would like some thoughts or even
contributions.
https://github.com/juangburgos/QUaServer
Thanks,
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Mark De Wit (10 April 2019 12:36) wrote:
> It might be good to highlight, for instance, that MSecsSinceEpoch is
> not share-able between users in different timezones unless QDateTime
> is instantiated with a timespec of Qt::UTC (which is not the default).
In what sense can't "milliseconds since ep
Hi,
I would like to request for a new repository:
Name of the repository: qt-labs/qtalexa.git
Description: A environment enabling a use of Alexa an Qt based UI systems.
Responsible person: Vladimir Minenko
Gerrit user/email: vladimir.mine...@pelagicore.com
We developed an initial version of inte
Hi,
I would like to request for a new repository:
Name of the repository: qt-labs/qtuianalytics.git
Description: An plugin for Qt Quick allowing collection of UI usage analytics.
Responsible person: Vladimir Minenko
Gerrit user/email: vladimir.mine...@pelagicore.com
We developed an initial versi
Hi,
As informed earlier string freeze for Qt 5.13 is now in effect. So please, no
changes to translatable strings from this point, unless approved by the
documentation team.
br,
Jani
From: Jani Heikkinen
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 11:45 AM
To: local
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Thiago Macieira
> > On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 05:11:03 PDT Pouya Shahinfar wrote:
> > You open a project which is developed by someone else, and he/she used
> > QDateTime for holding time and date. The problem here is you as a
> > newcomer to project do not know t
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2019 11:23 AM
> To: development@qt-project.org; Khuram Ali
> Subject: Re: [Development] A deployment tool for Linux
>
> Handily, there has been a concerted effort to create linux
Handily, there has been a concerted effort to create linuxdeploy, which is a
pluginified and much cleaned up version of linuxdeployqt :)
https://github.com/linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy
On Wednesday, 10 April 2019 10:15:27 BST Khuram Ali via Development wrote:
> Hi,
> I think, it is a good idea to hav
Hi,
I think, it is a good idea to have an official deployment tool as we have for
windows. linuxdeployqt works but as mentioned earlier slower and older. The
things can get a bit better.
Regards,Khuram Ali
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
Von: Mitch Curtis
An: Bogdan Vatra ; development@qt
> -Original Message-
> From: Bogdan Vatra
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2019 10:22 AM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Cc: Mitch Curtis
> Subject: Re: [Development] A deployment tool for Linux
>
> Hi,
>
> Personally I think it's a great idea. I used linuxdeployqt myself and it
> worke
Hi,
Personally I think it's a great idea. I used linuxdeployqt myself and it
worked. The only problem I saw it was the speed, it takes quite a lot to
complete (e.g. it took a few minutes, while androiddelopqt takes less than 10
seconds). But witl some love I'm pretty sure it can be improved a
What do people think about having a deployment tool for Linux? There is an
existing community tool based on macdeployqt:
https://github.com/probonopd/linuxdeployqt/
The author has considered the idea in the past:
https://github.com/probonopd/linuxdeployqt/issues/84
A Jira suggestion to track i
25 matches
Mail list logo
