On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:44:45PM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 10.04.2019, 21:38, "André Pönitz" <apoen...@t-online.de>: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:13:01AM +0000, Mitch Curtis wrote: > >> What do people think about having a deployment tool for Linux? > > > > I, as a person, think that a "deployment tool for Linux" is > > something that spits out packages in half a dozen "native" > > distribution package formats. > > Nope, that tool is called "package maintainer" :)
That concept is notorious for lacking usable copy constructors ;-} > > Collecting "resources that the application uses (like [...] > > graphics, [...]" *and dependencies* would be a (important) > > step, but not all that it takes. > > By this logic windeployqt should produce .msi packages Funnily enough that would be a goal when I were to develop an installer system. Or, should I say, "was". Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
