That's different from the item models.
Cheers,
Lars
On 2 May 2018, at 08:45, Christian Ehrlicher
mailto:ch.ehrlic...@gmx.de>> wrote:
Hi,
There is already a component "Widgets: Itemviews" which should be renamed then.
Christian
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 02. Mai 2018 um 08:37 Uhr
Von: "Lars Knoll" m
Hi,
There is already a component "Widgets: Itemviews" which should be renamed then.
Christian
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 02. Mai 2018 um 08:37 Uhr
Von: "Lars Knoll"
An: "Alex Blasche"
Cc: "Qt development mailing list"
Betreff: Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Mod
I'd say we add one line for qtbase/Qt Core/Item models in the maintainer wiki.
'Item models' would probably also be the best name for Jira.
Cheers,
Lars
> On 2 May 2018, at 08:34, Alex Blasche wrote:
>
> It was pointed out to me that this vote has come due. The usual response is
> to update J
It was pointed out to me that this vote has come due. The usual response is to
update Jira components and the maintainer wiki. Neither of these have a
category for this. What is the conclusion here? Do we need a new entry in the
wiki and Jira? If so what would be the name for it.
--
Alex
_
Thanks for the trust everyone.
On 30/04/2018 10:54, Alex Blasche wrote:
Congratulations to Oliver. The wiki was updated.
--
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Development [mailto:development-
bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Maurice
Kalinowski
Sent: Monday, 9 A
Michael Corcoran wrote:
> On 05/01/2018 11:18 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>> I just tried to support nested structures and given nested structures
>> and template specializations aren't commutative then it's not possible
>> to support them if you want to respect the access scope at the same
>> time.
