It was pointed out to me that this vote has come due. The usual response is to update Jira components and the maintainer wiki. Neither of these have a category for this. What is the conclusion here? Do we need a new entry in the wiki and Jira? If so what would be the name for it.
-- Alex ________________________________________ From: Development <development-bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Stephen Kelly <steve...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, 1 April 2018 8:18:24 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models Sérgio Martins wrote: > Hi, > > > Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David > Faure has been an unofficial maintainer. > David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is > someone you'll always want to add as reviewer. > > He's well known in the community and already maintains QtXmlPatterns, Qt > mimetypes and Qt3Support. > > Disclaimer: David works with me at KDAB. > (And if you're wondering if KDAB has any plans for this module, the > answer is no. In fact I hope it remains low change volume). > > > Finally, a big thanks to the previous maintainer, Stephen Kelly, who did > a great job, both on Qt and KDE models! +1 for David from me too! Greetings, Steve. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
