Re: [Development] Qt 4.8: disabling the CI and closing for anything except security fixes

2015-08-13 Thread Knoll Lars
On 14/08/15 08:25, "Sarajärvi Tony" wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: development-bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany.com@qt- >> project.org [mailto:development- >> bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of >> Thiago Macieira >> Sent: 14. elokuuta 2015 3:40

Re: [Development] Qt 4.8: disabling the CI and closing for anything except security fixes

2015-08-13 Thread Sarajärvi Tony
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: 14. elokuuta 2015 3:40 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Develo

[Development] Qt 4.8: disabling the CI and closing for anything except security fixes

2015-08-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
I recently tried to fix a very simple bug in Qt 4.8 but I can't get the change to integrate because the CI seems to have fallen into disrepair. Instead of using valuable QA time in fixing the CI for 4.8, I'd like to propose instead that we simply disable the CI for that version and close Qt 4.8

Re: [Development] New Module Request: QtGeniviExtras

2015-08-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 13 August 2015 10:29:31 Turunen Tuukka wrote: > Like Thiago and other have pointed out we of course would like to have the > content of the new module well suited for Qt before it can become part of a > Qt release. I think the best way to achieve this is to do the work within > the Qt P

Re: [Development] New Module Request: QtGeniviExtras

2015-08-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 13 August 2015 10:32:42 Dominik Holland wrote: > > Another option is to split the category name by the dots and select the > > first letter of each section. So "qt.qpa.windows" is "qqw", while > > "qt.widgets.gestures" is "qwg". > > Using that approach i'm already getting 4 clashes of

Re: [Development] [RFC] decommissioning the qtonpi mailing list

2015-08-13 Thread Sergio Ahumada
On 13.08.2015 11:47, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > moin, > > the qtonpi mailing list didn't have a single message in close to a year; > interest@ and development@ serve the remaining needs much better at this > point. > to cut down maintenance effort, i'd like to shut the list down, leaving > only t

[Development] [QML][Multimedia] Multiple video outputs from one Camera

2015-08-13 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi all. Is it possible to show a video from the one Camera to multiple VideoOutputs? E.g. this code: import QtQuick 2.4 import QtMultimedia 5.4 Rectangle { id: root Camera { id: cam } Column { VideoOutput { source: cam; width: 50; height: 50 } VideoOutput {

Re: [Development] New Module Request: QtGeniviExtras

2015-08-13 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Dominik Holland > Sent: 13. elokuuta 2015 12:37 > To: André Somers > Cc: development@qt-project.o

Re: [Development] Use QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE macro for specific enum values

2015-08-13 Thread Smith Martin
But it has actually been used to deprecate single enum values. Here is an example from QTextFormat: class Q_GUI_EXPORT QTextFormat { Q_GADGET public: enum FormatType { InvalidFormat = -1, BlockFormat = 1, CharFormat = 2, ListFormat = 3, #if QT_DEPRECATED_SI

[Development] [RFC] decommissioning the qtonpi mailing list

2015-08-13 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
moin, the qtonpi mailing list didn't have a single message in close to a year; interest@ and development@ serve the remaining needs much better at this point. to cut down maintenance effort, i'd like to shut the list down, leaving only the archives intact. objections? if you want to "nominate" ot

Re: [Development] New Module Request: QtGeniviExtras

2015-08-13 Thread Dominik Holland
On 08/13/2015 11:08 AM, André Somers wrote: > > >> IMHO the users of QtGeniviExtras and the DLT logging are totally aware >> of how the system works and want to have full control over it. >> DLT is only known in the automotive space and there it's only used for >> GENIVI linux based systems. So

Re: [Development] New Module Request: QtGeniviExtras

2015-08-13 Thread André Somers
> IMHO the users of QtGeniviExtras and the DLT logging are totally aware > of how the system works and want to have full control over it. > DLT is only known in the automotive space and there it's only used for > GENIVI linux based systems. So i think we talk about a logging solution > which 90%

Re: [Development] New Module Request: QtGeniviExtras

2015-08-13 Thread Dominik Holland
On 08/12/2015 04:36 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday 12 August 2015 14:26:26 Robert Griebl wrote: Every LoggingCategory (In DLT it's called Context) needs to have a 3 characters long unique identifier and a Description. >>> >>> Stupid API limitation. Can you convince GENIVI to