On Thursday 13 August 2015 10:29:31 Turunen Tuukka wrote: > Like Thiago and other have pointed out we of course would like to have the > content of the new module well suited for Qt before it can become part of a > Qt release. I think the best way to achieve this is to do the work within > the Qt Project and Qt repositories, after which we can then at some point > have a module that is well fit for Qt and its purpose.
To be clear: I'm not against the creation of a repository for GENIVI extra functionality. I am for it. I am, however, questioning the design of the API that Dominik presented. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
