Hi all,
It seems we cannot start merge from dev branch to stable at the moment because
there is still some issues to be solved before that:
1. There seems to be compilation break in dev branch, see
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,78283. That needs to be solved first
2. The
Hi Fawzi,
Thanks for the explanation.
You are right. Though the message is misleading, it appears to work.
I tried the below simple test and it worked as expected.
App1.pro:
ios {
iphonesimulator {
message("iphonesimulator")
DEFINES += iphonesimulator
}
iphoneos{
Em dom 16 fev 2014, às 21:25:29, Hausmann Simon escreveu:
> libQt5WebKit will execute QtWebProcess.
>
> It also links against widgets if it is available at build time, but that is
> an optional dependency. (it is used for style initialization)
>
> Unless something has changed there recently
The
On 16 February 2014 03:06, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> After some build system reworking recently and a little discussion
>> amongst the interested parties (Matt Vogt, Valerio), I'd like to
>> propose renaming QMF (Qt Messaging
libQt5WebKit will execute QtWebProcess.
It also links against widgets if it is available at build time, but that is an
optional dependency. (it is used for style initialization)
Unless something has changed there recently :)
Simon
Opprinnelig melding
Fra: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Yes, on architectures not supported by JIT/llint, the portable c-loop llint
backend should be built/used. This is supposed to happen automatically (at
build time).
Simon
Opprinnelig melding
Fra: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Sendt: 15:20 fredag 14. februar 2014
Til: development@qt-proje
Hi! In Debian (and most probably Ubuntu too) we are currently shipping
libQt5WebKit5 and libQt5WebKitWidgets5 in the same. This has the disadvantage
of making more difficult to maintain proper symbols files [0].
So I took the time to split them and came to the following situation:
- libQt5WebKi
Em dom 16 fev 2014, às 15:09:49, Giuseppe D'Angelo escreveu:
> I guess that for Kate's purposes a small wrapper class around QRegExp
> + QRegularExpression would suffice for supporting both syntaxes. For
> the future, we could instead think of adding wildcard and fixed-string
> pattern types to QRe
On 14 February 2014 18:25, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
>
> That said... is there any technical reason why QRegExp couldn't sprout a
> PCRE expression type, that would use QRegularExpression internally? That
> would neatly solve the expression types problem (though
> QRegularExpression would still have
Hi,
I would like to propose a feature for Qt Quick Designer to allow to export
QML file into an image. For example, when you are editing a QML in
graphical mode , you may press right click on a specific "state" then it
will show a popup menu. Then you may choose to export the "state" into an
image
10 matches
Mail list logo