KDAB on site, but effectively, I read incorrectly, it is the session on opengl
Guillaume
- Mail original -
> De: "Laszlo Papp"
> À: "guillaume belz"
> Cc: development@qt-project.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Août 2013 06:01:24
> Objet: Re: [Development] Qt3D status in Qt 5.2
> On Wed, Aug 2
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:21 PM, wrote:
> HS: you made a presentation to the Qt Contributor's Summit 2013 on Qt3D,
> it is possible to have more info?
>
Hmm, where did you read that? There was an opengl session where Qt3D was
briefly brought up, but I have not heard about a dedicated presentati
Thanks Kurt :)
I've got some time today reading Qt 5.1.1 (and its
Webkit) source code. What I found was a big mess :)
I understand now
that your implementation is valid, and I think it should continue as is
until further notice. Unfortunately, there is already a websocket client
implementati
On 29 Aug 2013, at 00:21, development-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
> From: Richard Gerd Kuesters
> Subject: Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets
> Date: 28 Aug 2013 19:28:11 GMT+02:00
> To: development@qt-project.org
>
> A couple of things got me thinking about the WebSocket implemen
Hello,
Sorry, my questions were not clear. I especially wanted to know if you need
help with this module and what bugs (which I could work) could prevent the
release of Qt3D in Qt 5.2?
HS: you made a presentation to the Qt Contributor's Summit 2013 on Qt3D,
it is possible to have more i
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 20:09:27 Raul Metsma wrote:
> Just verifying can I use c++11 fetaures (eg initializer list with
> qlist/qvector) with qt clang++/stdc++ binary build?
Normally, since Qt do not use the standard library in it's ABI, and that
clang's libc++ is in another namespace, it is
Hi all. Sorry for dragging this subject again, but here we go.
A couple of things got me thinking about the WebSocket implementation:
1. Almost (if not all) web browser network interactions (HTTP, FTP
(limited), file) are created by QNetworkAccessManager - which also
provides proxy configurati
Just verifying can I use c++11 fetaures (eg initializer list with
qlist/qvector) with qt clang++/stdc++ binary build?
Raul
On Aug 28, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 28 de agosto de 2013 17:06:25, Raul Metsma wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Is there any plans release with qt 5.
On quarta-feira, 28 de agosto de 2013 17:06:25, Raul Metsma wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any plans release with qt 5.2 separate prebuilt binaries for
> clang/libc++. Current clang/libstdc++
No, why should we? What are the benefits?
I know the drawbacks:
1) we can't create packages that target 10.6
2
Hi
Is there any plans release with qt 5.2 separate prebuilt binaries for
clang/libc++.
Current clang/libstdc++
Raul
On Aug 26, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> this is just a friendly reminder on quality criteria we should pass for
> new modules and new features that y
Some new info about this situation.
Qt-creator 2.8.1 that is Qt 4.8 based work normal. So I find cmake via one
Qtcreator and
the new (Qt5.1.1 based Qtcreator) one works with cmake well.
So strange tricks.
2013/8/28 Oleg Shalnev
> Hello all!
>
> I am the one so unhappy ?
> Working with qt-creato
Hi all,
We are happy to announce that Qt 5.1.1 is released today, see
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/08/28/qt-5-1-1-released/
Big thanks to everyone who has helped make the release happen!
Br,
Jani
--
Jani Heikkinen
Release M
Hi,
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 2.8.1 and Qt Installer
Framework 1.4.0!
See also the details in the blog post:
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/08/28/qt-creator-2-8-1-installer-framework-1-4-0-released/
--
Regards
Kai
--
Kai Köhne, Senior Software Engineer - D
Hi,
just as a heads up we hope to be able to get at least the qtbase
part of Qt's winrt port into dev before feature freeze. Plan is to
create the merge request by September 6 so that there is enough time
for reviews. If you want to have a look earlier you are of course
welcome to do so as well. C
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 09:37:47 guillaume.b...@free.fr wrote:
> Hello,
> I wonder if it's planned to add Qt3D in Qt 5.2 ? If this is not the case,
> what's missing? I saw on bugreport there are several major unsolved issue.
> All must be solved before feature freeze? Thanks
> Guillaume Be
Hi,
> We had some good discussions around Qt
> Connectivity, Mac/Win Extras and Location during the contributor summit,
>and should conclude on these modules very soon now.
For the QtWinExtras, I can say that we have added documentation and
tests and are now in the final stages of polishing
These kinds of errors can usually be diagnosed by increasing the output
verbosity a bit. Try running "macdeployqt myapp.app -verbose=2". Where does the
reference to QtScript come from?
Morten
On Aug 25, 2013, at 10:45 AM, qtnext wrote:
> is there any chance that maceployqt will be fixed for
Hello,
I wonder if it's planned to add Qt3D in Qt 5.2 ? If this is not the case,
what's missing?
I saw on bugreport there are several major unsolved issue. All must be solved
before feature freeze?
Thanks
Guillaume Belz ___
Development mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo
