On quinta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2013 14:20:31, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > 1) Drop simd.prf and the runtime checking
> >
> > This means dropping the special builds. We'd #include the special files if
> > the user is building Qt for a special target.
>
> Can't you get rid of these special file
Please report on https://bugreports.qt-project.org if you had found a
regression with proper information.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
> I tried to work with sound.
> that would be the nogo for a upgrade to 5.1
> can someone please fix the sound working qith a qrc file?
>
Well, I'm interested in websocket. Since websocket has been one of the
most popular protocols among internet, espcially in real-time based
websites. It's good to see it in Qt, no matter as add-on or directly in
the source.
But in my own opinion, add-on may loss support during version bump of
On quinta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2013 02:20:34, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> BTW: I only received 2 responses to this mail: does that mean, this is not
> important enough to be considered for inclusion? I am a bit confused about
> how to proceed. Do I just dump the code into gitorious, and wait for
> react
Hello all
I've been running through this problem for a while. I might have finally a
solution, but I'd like to see if there are other options and which of the
solutions we should go for.
== Quick medium-sized summary of the problem:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-30440
I tried to work with sound.
that would be the nogo for a upgrade to 5.1
can someone please fix the sound working qith a qrc file?
thanks
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On quarta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2013 11:10:28, Thomas Hartmann wrote:
> On most systems compression does save time, since computation
> (decompression) is magnitudes faster then reading from any kind of
> persistent memory. Of course real life benchmarks should make this
> decision and compress
On quarta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2013 18:33:14, Knoll Lars wrote:
> >Past experience shows that this does not work. It won't be checked, and
> >even
> >if it is checked, all the issues won't be fixed in time.
> >
> >If we disable the tests, let's do it with open eyes: there will be
> >regressions
>
On quarta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2013 11:13:09, Alan Alpert wrote:
> > yes, it *must* be extended. you must make the system find the plugins
> > themselves, not the qmldir files.
>
> You've failed to convince me that this *must* happen. The current
> system works fine, this change would not fix th
On quarta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2013 14:54:53, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Thiago Macieira
> > However much I dislike common denominators, what is the common denominator
> > API
> > that we can provide in all platforms?
>
> Hi!
> I've put together a small table displaying w
On quarta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2013 09:32:33, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > I'm located in the US, so I'm not allowed to modify the SSL code. If
> > you're in the US, you're not either. And now here's an interesting
> > question: are people working for American companies allowed to modify the
> > SSL
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On terça-feira, 13 de agosto de 2013 19:50:23, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > It's not pretty and we'll probably want to iterate over the API, but
> here's
> > the status:
> > - icu: everything works wonderful. Unicorns.
> > - posix: you can't select
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 13 August 2013 23:18, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > To be clear, this discussion is not about altering the functionality
> > of the sanity bot. The current discussion is about the Gerrit
> > interface to the sanity
On Aug 14, 2013, at 3:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 08/13/2013 07:32 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On terça-feira, 13 de agosto de 2013 19:11:16, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> // Initialize peer verification.
>>> if (configuration.peerVerifyMode == QSslSocket::VerifyNone) {
>>>
14 matches
Mail list logo
