Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Bornemann Joerg
Hi Sascha, My point is that we cannot know whether we'll have to encode the platform in a function name again in the future, in which case we'll have functions with and without the platform in their name. Your point is that this won't ever happen. We can just avoid this risk of an inconsistent f

Re: [Development] GSoC 2013

2013-02-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2013 20.03.49, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > Is it required for this person to be "affiliated" with the Qt Project > > Hosting Foundation somehow or could this be administred by KDE people > > as well? > > Quickly reading through the agreement and terms for mentori

Re: [Development] GSoC 2013

2013-02-25 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> Lähettäjä: development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=digia@qt-project.org > [development- > bounces+tuukka.turunen=digia@qt-project.org] käyttäjän > Giuseppe D'Angelo > [dange...@gmail.com] puolesta > Lähetetty: 25. helmikuuta 2013 21:48 > Vastaanotta

Re: [Development] GSoC 2013

2013-02-25 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 25 February 2013 20:44, Thiago Macieira wrote: > The real question here is if there is anyone with the time required to admin > the effort. Is it required for this person to be "affiliated" with the Qt Project Hosting Foundation somehow or could this be administred by KDE people as well? Che

Re: [Development] GSoC 2013

2013-02-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2013 19.14.16, Lydia Pintscher wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Mathieu STEFANI > > wrote: > > Any update on this ? > > > > I think that Qt Project would greatly benefit from such a program that > > GSoC represents. > > > > Let's deal with legal iss

Re: [Development] GSoC 2013

2013-02-25 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Mathieu STEFANI wrote: > Any update on this ? > > I think that Qt Project would greatly benefit from such a program that > GSoC represents. > > Let's deal with legal issues right now and get prepared for project > submission. If there's still legal problems KDE mi

Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Sascha Cunz
On Monday, February 25, 2013 05:50:06 PM Joerg Bornemann wrote: > On 25/02/2013 17:25, Sascha Cunz wrote: > > Why would a function that is "potentially useful on more than one > > platform" go to platform extras? > > Because it's working on native types (more than just one) and encoding > all type

Re: [Development] GSoC 2013

2013-02-25 Thread Mathieu STEFANI
Any update on this ? I think that Qt Project would greatly benefit from such a program that GSoC represents. Let's deal with legal issues right now and get prepared for project submission. On 13-02-13 04:08 PM, Mathieu STEFANI wrote: Hello everyone, Last year, an attempt

[Development] Installation and compilation Qt Linux embedded

2013-02-25 Thread Juan Zampa
Hi everyone I have followed instructions from QT webpage, but I have many problems to cross-compile an example (plugandpaint) I installed Qt embedded 4.8 without demos and examples succesfully. Now I'm trying to compile plugins to use with "plugandpaint" application (plugandpaintplugins). Steps

Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 25/02/2013 17:25, Sascha Cunz wrote: > Why would a function that is "potentially useful on more than one platform" go > to platform extras? Because it's working on native types (more than just one) and encoding all type names into the function name would be strange. The same function name co

Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Sascha Cunz
On Monday, February 25, 2013 05:12:48 PM Joerg Bornemann wrote: > On 25/02/2013 16:27, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote: > > I'd prefer Qt namespace with no platform indicators, i.e.: > > > > Qt::toHICON > > Qt::toHBITMAP > > Qt::toCGImageRef > > Qt::toNSString > > > > It's obvious to which platform e

Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Jake Thomas Petroules
Why is that...? Jake Petroules Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com) Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821 On Feb 25, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Joerg Bornemann wrote: > On 25/02/2013 16:27, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote: > >> I'd prefer Qt namespace with no platform indic

Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 25/02/2013 16:27, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote: > I'd prefer Qt namespace with no platform indicators, i.e.: > > Qt::toHICON > Qt::toHBITMAP > Qt::toCGImageRef > Qt::toNSString > > It's obvious to which platform each function belongs; there's no need to > qualify it beyond necessary. If WinRT i

Re: [Development] Qt 5.1 feature set and freeze date

2013-02-25 Thread Pasion Jerome
Hello, The main requirements are: -the docs are modularized and conform to the Qt 5 documentation structure: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt5DocumentationProject -the docs compile readily using "make docs" I only listed modules that have an official stable (or master) branch. The Qt Quick Control

Re: [Development] Compiling with GCC 4.8

2013-02-25 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Monday, February 25, 2013 08:07:48 Thiago Macieira wrote: > It was a matter of timing. Since GCC 4.8 is not released yet, I can't make > the case for it being a P1. I fully disagree with that :). I think compile fixes for compilers that are not released yet qualify. But what's done is done,

Re: [Development] Compiling with GCC 4.8

2013-02-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2013 11.31.01, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Saturday, February 23, 2013 23:19:33 David Narvaez wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Thiago Macieira > > > > wrote: > > > I haven't seen any patches fixing warnings or compilation errors come in > > > for 4.8

Re: [Development] Evolving Qt's multithreading API

2013-02-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2013 20.36.24, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > Thank you for the comprehensive explanation. I know little about Qt's > internal mechanisms, so I'm curious now. > > Could the guarantee also be provided by posting QThread::start() into > the event loop during setup? > >

Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Jake Thomas Petroules
I'd prefer Qt namespace with no platform indicators, i.e.: Qt::toHICON Qt::toHBITMAP Qt::toCGImageRef Qt::toNSString It's obvious to which platform each function belongs; there's no need to qualify it beyond necessary. If WinRT introduces an NSString class and OS X adds HBITMAPs only then shoul

[Development] Review of wip/android multimedia plugin

2013-02-25 Thread Christian S
The multimedia plugin for android is now getting into usable state, and before we start looking at the possibility of merging into dev, we would like to get some feedback on the code. If you feel up for it, please take a look at the squashed commit on Gerrit. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#c

Re: [Development] Qt 5.1 feature set and freeze date

2013-02-25 Thread Thomas McGuire
Hi, On Wednesday 13 February 2013 09:49:56 Knoll Lars wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I would like to start the feature freeze Qt 5.1 middle of March. This is a > bit later then I originally proposed in December. There's two reasons for > this. First of all it'll reduce some of the integration pressur

Re: [Development] Evolving Qt's multithreading API

2013-02-25 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On 24 February 2013 01:24, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sábado, 23 de fevereiro de 2013 20.26.11, Sze Howe Koh wrote: >> On 23 February 2013 00:11, Thiago Macieira > wrote: >> > The fact is that any QObject that is returned from those functions -- if >> > any -- must belong to the calling thread.

Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 25/02/2013 09:35, Sorvig Morten wrote: > - Stand-alone function namespace: > * Qt::toPlatformType (“Qt::toWindowsHBITMAP”. “Qt::toMacCGImageRef”) > -OR- > * QPlatform::toType(“QWindows::toHBITMAP”, "QMac::toCGImageRef") I vote for the latter naming scheme. We shoul

Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Pasion Jerome
Hello, Don't forget about the documentation. Some links: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Category:Developing_Qt::Documentation http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt5DocumentationProject Cheers, Jerome P. Documentation Engineer - Digia, Qt Fra: development-bounces+jero

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-02-25 Thread Tomasz Siekierda
Hi, I just want to drop in with a little thank you and basically to share my thoughts about QtSP. Last week I've built a project using QtSerialPort (with Qt4) to communicate with an Arduino board, and tested it on Linux (Ubuntu and Kubuntu) and Windows (7 and embedded), on numerous PCs (VM, laptop

Re: [Development] Compiling with GCC 4.8

2013-02-25 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Saturday, February 23, 2013 23:19:33 David Narvaez wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Thiago Macieira > > wrote: > > I haven't seen any patches fixing warnings or compilation errors come in > > for 4.8. Usually, there are a few warnings that need fixing but until my > > -Werror patches

[Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Sorvig Morten
Hi, Getting ready for the 5.1 feature freeze, I think we should take some time unifying the structure and API of the platform extras modules. There has already been some private discussion on this topic, and this is an attempt at reaching a final consensus. I think it's important that these mo