On Monday, February 25, 2013 05:12:48 PM Joerg Bornemann wrote: > On 25/02/2013 16:27, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote: > > I'd prefer Qt namespace with no platform indicators, i.e.: > > > > Qt::toHICON > > Qt::toHBITMAP > > Qt::toCGImageRef > > Qt::toNSString > > > > It's obvious to which platform each function belongs; there's no need to > > qualify it beyond necessary. If WinRT introduces an NSString class and OS > > X adds HBITMAPs only then should we think about adding the platform name > > to the function. :) > That means we're restricting ourselves to type conversion functions? > A function that's potentially useful on more than one platform wouldn't > be possible.
Why would a function that is "potentially useful on more than one platform" go to platform extras? Sascha _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
