Re: [Development] Qt modules missing mandatory LICENSE files

2013-02-07 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2013/2/8 Thiago Macieira : >> I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be >> shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently >> only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker >> for distributing the modules. ... > I think it's ok. L

Re: [Development] Qt modules missing mandatory LICENSE files

2013-02-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 8 de fevereiro de 2013 08.04.54, Timo Jyrinki wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be > shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently > only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker > for dis

[Development] Qt modules missing mandatory LICENSE files

2013-02-07 Thread Timo Jyrinki
Hi, I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker for distributing the modules. I started up with qtchooser [1] (merged) and submitted an

Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

2013-02-07 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Joseph Crowell > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:56 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] I

Re: [Development] which branch for a bugfix

2013-02-07 Thread Friedemann Kleint
Hi, > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-28196 For that particular bug, there is already a fix in the works at https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,41537 . Accidentally, I got it prototypically to work today with MSVC. As it is a bit involved, it is in the 'dev' branch. Reg

[Development] which branch for a bugfix

2013-02-07 Thread Mojmír Svoboda
Hello, I'd like to fix following bug: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-28196 But as I am new in here, I do not know "the ropes". The fix itself lies in submodule qtbase, mainly in angle sources (plus the nasty declspec(import), but i think i saw someone fixing it already). Accordin

Re: [Development] Nominating Andreas Hanssen as Approver

2013-02-07 Thread Bache-Wiig Jens
On Feb 7, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Andreas Aardal Hanssen mailto:andr...@hanssen.name>> wrote: 2013/2/7 Eirik Aavitsland mailto:eirik.aavitsl...@digia.com>> >> +1 of course >> Also a bit surprised to hear that he's not already an approver. :)A >> distinguished developer like Andreas does not deserve

Re: [Development] Nominating Andreas Hanssen as Approver

2013-02-07 Thread Andreas Aardal Hanssen
2013/2/7 Eirik Aavitsland > >> +1 of course > >> Also a bit surprised to hear that he's not already an approver. :)A > distinguished developer like Andreas does not deserve this BASIC-like > "+1" syntax. I say: > ++ > and strongly, too :) Shucks guys ;'-) you're the best! Ready to pay back som

Re: [Development] Nominating Andreas Hanssen as Approver

2013-02-07 Thread Eirik Aavitsland
On 02/07/2013 10:50 AM, Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > On Thursday 7 February 2013 09:44:38 Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: >> On 02/06/2013 10:31 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> Andreas is a long-time Qt developer. For those of you who haven't yet had >>> the pleasure of meeting him, he's

Re: [Development] cant folderlistmodel with Qt5

2013-02-07 Thread Rutledge Shawn
On 7 Feb 2013, at 12:56 AM, Łukasz Korbel wrote: > I'm trying to load FolderListModel plugin: > import Qt.labs.folderlistmodel 2.0 > > and got this error: > main.qml:2:1: module "Qt.labs.folderlistmodel" is not installed > > I was using code from that plugin as template to implement my own an

Re: [Development] Nominating Andreas Hanssen as Approver

2013-02-07 Thread Paul Olav Tvete
On Thursday 7 February 2013 09:44:38 Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: > On 02/06/2013 10:31 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Hello > > > > Andreas is a long-time Qt developer. For those of you who haven't yet had > > the pleasure of meeting him, he's the brains behind the original > > implementatio

Re: [Development] Nominating Andreas Hanssen as Approver

2013-02-07 Thread Saether Jan-Arve
+1 > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+jan-arve.saether=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+jan-arve.saether=digia@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: 6. februar 2013 22:32 > To: development > Subject: [Development] Nominating Andreas

Re: [Development] Nominating Andreas Hanssen as Approver

2013-02-07 Thread Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
On 02/06/2013 10:31 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Hello > > Andreas is a long-time Qt developer. For those of you who haven't yet had the > pleasure of meeting him, he's the brains behind the original implementation > and maintenance of Graphics View. Before that, I remember working with him on > th

Re: [Development] Nominating Andreas Hanssen as Approver

2013-02-07 Thread Knoll Lars
On 2/7/13 8:01 AM, "Samuel Rødal" wrote: >On 02/06/2013 10:42 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote: >> On Wednesday 06 February 2013 13:31:40 Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> Andreas is a long-time Qt developer. For those of you who haven't yet >>>had >>> the pleasure of meeting him, he's the brains