Hello Pavel,
On 21.12.23 16:13, Pavel Pisa wrote:
On Thursday 21 of December 2023 15:37:57 Sebastian Huber wrote:
From: Tyler Miller
---
bsps/arm/tms570/start/pinmux.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/tms570/start/pinmux.c
b/bsps/arm/tms570/start/pinmu
On 04.01.24 19:34, berndmoessne...@gmail.com wrote:
@@ -490,7 +491,9 @@ static int rtems_flashdev_do_init(
void ( *destroy )( rtems_flashdev *flash )
)
{
- rtems_recursive_mutex_init( &flash->mutex, "RTEMS_FLASHDEV Flash" );
+ char mtx_name[19];
+ sprintf(mtx_name, "FDEV_MTX_%08x", (un
Hi Joel,
have a great 2024!
On 12/24/23 22:16, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
>
> Trying to bring up Coverity builds on a Centos 8 machine, I ran into
this:
>
> + ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --log=l-sparc.txt
> --prefix=/home/joel/rtems-cron-coverity/tools/6 --mail --mail-to=
> bu...@rtems.org
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:13 AM Frank Kühndel <
frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> have a great 2024!
>
> On 12/24/23 22:16, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Trying to bring up Coverity builds on a Centos 8 machine, I ran into
> this:
> >
> > + ../source-builder/sb-se
A few comments inline below. For the most part, this looks good.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 9:15 AM wrote:
> From: Bernd Moessner
>
> This patch adds support for the Xilinx ZYNQ 7000 series. Please note that
> this patch also affects ZYNQ Ultrascale+ as I`ve moved some functions from
> zynqmp/xil_s
Looks good to me. There is generally no need for a 0/X email when X is
small unless you think it is necessary. In this case, a message of "see
patch" isn't very useful.
Kinsey
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 12:27 PM wrote:
> From: Bernd Moessner
>
> ---
> bsps/include/xil/xparameters.h | 2 +-
> 1 fi
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 7:13 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 04.01.24 19:34, berndmoessne...@gmail.com wrote:
> > @@ -490,7 +491,9 @@ static int rtems_flashdev_do_init(
> > void ( *destroy )( rtems_flashdev *flash )
> > )
> > {
> > - rtems_recursive_mut
---
cpukit/libblock/src/media.c | 2 +-
cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/fat.c | 2 +-
cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/msdos_file.c | 5 +
cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/msdos_misc.c | 3 ++-
cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_memfile.c | 1 -
cpukit/posix/src/killinfo.c | 1 -
6 files changed, 9 ins
---
cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/msdos_misc.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/msdos_misc.c
b/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/msdos_misc.c
index c40988b98f..cd59c494ea 100644
--- a/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/msdos_misc.c
+++ b/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/msdos_misc.c
@@ -1303,7
I consider it is a mistake to commit this patch. We have no idea who or where
this is being used by users.
Chris
On 6/1/2024 4:56 am, Bernd Moessner wrote:
>
> On 05.01.2024 18:54, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>> I assume this is to support the Zynq7000 under rtems-lwip since it would need
>> those insta
10 matches
Mail list logo
