Looks good to me. There is generally no need for a 0/X email when X is
small unless you think it is necessary. In this case, a message of "see
patch" isn't very useful.
Kinsey
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 12:27 PM <berndmoessne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Bernd Moessner <berndmoessne...@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> bsps/include/xil/xparameters.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/bsps/include/xil/xparameters.h
> b/bsps/include/xil/xparameters.h
> index b665810643..9d4d95eacb 100644
> --- a/bsps/include/xil/xparameters.h
> +++ b/bsps/include/xil/xparameters.h
> @@ -41,4 +41,4 @@ extern "C" {
> }
> #endif
>
> -#endif /* XIL_PRINTF_H */
> +#endif /* XPARAMETERS_H */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
