Re: waf bsp_defaults appears to be broken

2021-10-04 Thread Christian MAUDERER
Hello Joel, Am 03.10.21 um 18:06 schrieb Joel Sherrill: Hi No BSP was successfully built in the build sweep Friday. All have failures like this: $ ./waf bsp_defaults --rtems-bsps=powerpc/psim I just tested this command and everything seems to work fine. I get a default config for the BSP.

Re: waf bsp_defaults appears to be broken

2021-10-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:32 AM Christian MAUDERER wrote: > > Hello Joel, > > Am 03.10.21 um 18:06 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > > Hi > > > > No BSP was successfully built in the build sweep Friday. All have > > failures like this: > > > > $ ./waf bsp_defaults --rtems-bsps=powerpc/psim > > I just tested

Re: waf bsp_defaults appears to be broken

2021-10-04 Thread Christian MAUDERER
Am 04.10.21 um 15:51 schrieb Joel Sherrill: On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:32 AM Christian MAUDERER wrote: Hello Joel, Am 03.10.21 um 18:06 schrieb Joel Sherrill: Hi No BSP was successfully built in the build sweep Friday. All have failures like this: $ ./waf bsp_defaults --rtems-bsps=powerpc/ps

Re: waf bsp_defaults appears to be broken

2021-10-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:13 AM Christian MAUDERER wrote: > > Am 04.10.21 um 15:51 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:32 AM Christian MAUDERER > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello Joel, > >> > >> Am 03.10.21 um 18:06 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> No BSP was successfully built

[RTEMS 5] Add support for IDLE Thread stack allocator

2021-10-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
Add a stack allocator hook specifically for allocation of IDLE thread stacks. This allows the user to decide if IDLE thread stacks are statically allocated or handled by the same custom allocator mechanism as other thread stacks. Closes #4520. --- cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/percpu.h| 2

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] cpukit: Add signal mapping support

2021-10-04 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 02/10/2021 01:44, Chris Johns wrote: The fatal extensions have a well defined order (position in the table). The user has the full control over the initial extensions table. Is it backwards compatible when this new mode is enabled? When you enable a new feature you get new behaviour. I am n

Re: [RTEMS 5] Add support for IDLE Thread stack allocator

2021-10-04 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 04/10/2021 18:11, Joel Sherrill wrote: Add a stack allocator hook specifically for allocation of IDLE thread stacks. This allows the user to decide if IDLE thread stacks are statically allocated or handled by the same custom allocator mechanism as other thread stacks. Closes #4520. --- cpuk

Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] cpukit: Add Exception Manager

2021-10-04 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 01/10/2021 21:39, Kinsey Moore wrote: Sebastian, Could you be more specific about which parts of the architecture-dependent interface still seem tied to the AArch64 port? I thought I had made them sufficiently abstract by relying on architecture-specific functions to manipulate and take a

Certificate validation issue when trying to build qemu

2021-10-04 Thread Ryan Long
Hi, I'm trying to build qemu, but I keep getting this error message. RTEMS Source Builder - Set Builder, 6 (3950b1e2d857) Build Set: devel/qemu Build Set: devel/autotools-internal.bset config: devel/autoconf-2.69-1.cfg package: autoconf-2.69-x86_64-freebsd13.0-1 download: https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/

RE: Certificate validation issue when trying to build qemu

2021-10-04 Thread Ryan Long
Actually, I was only able to download it on my Linux VM. My FreeBSD 13 VM won't let me download it from the browser. I was using Firefox for both. -Original Message- From: devel On Behalf Of Ryan Long Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 2:40 PM To: devel@rtems.org Subject: Certificate validati

libbsd: Conditional compilation of tests

2021-10-04 Thread Kinsey Moore
Currently debugger01 is the only user of the test-if-library in libbsd and it doesn't seem to work as expected. The configure step that detects libdebugger occurs and succeeds as it should for the zynq a9 qemu BSP, but debugger01.exe never gets compiled. I found this behavior while working on t

Re: waf bsp_defaults appears to be broken

2021-10-04 Thread Chris Johns
On 4/10/21 3:06 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > No BSP was successfully built in the build sweep Friday. All have > failures like this: > > $ ./waf bsp_defaults --rtems-bsps=powerpc/psim > There is no top-level group with UID '/grp' in the specification > > The script fetches the BSP's defaults and th

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] cpukit: Add signal mapping support

2021-10-04 Thread Chris Johns
On 5/10/21 4:29 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 02/10/2021 01:44, Chris Johns wrote: >>> The fatal extensions have a well defined order (position in the >>> table). The user has the full control over the initial extensions table. >> Is it backwards compatible when this new mode is enabled? > > Whe

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] cpukit: Add signal mapping support

2021-10-04 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 05/10/2021 03:51, Chris Johns wrote: On 5/10/21 4:29 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 02/10/2021 01:44, Chris Johns wrote: The fatal extensions have a well defined order (position in the table). The user has the full control over the initial extensions table. Is it backwards compatible when th