On 5/10/21 4:29 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 02/10/2021 01:44, Chris Johns wrote: >>> The fatal extensions have a well defined order (position in the >>> table). The user has the full control over the initial extensions table. >> Is it backwards compatible when this new mode is enabled? > > When you enable a new feature you get new behaviour. I am not sure what you > mean > with backward compatible in this case. If you don't enable the exception to > signal mapping (default), then nothing changes.
"The user has the full control over the initial extensions table." Does this option change that? Is this feature mutually exclusive or additive to any "current control" a user has? In other words, it is not clear to me if I can add this option and still maintain any existing controls I may have. If it is not and users need to make changes the user code becomes a mess of version defines. Is that what we want? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
