Mention the type of the pointer in the parameter description. Use the
more general term "object" instead of "variable".
Update #3993.
---
c-user/barrier/directives.rst | 15 +++
c-user/clock/directives.rst | 44 +++-
c-user/dual-ported-memory/directi
Updated the link to the Raspberry Pi Firmware in RTEMS 5 docs, since the BSP
works with an older version of the firmware currently.
---
user/bsps/arm/raspberrypi.rst | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/bsps/arm/raspberrypi.rst b/user/bsps/arm/raspberryp
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 12:05 PM Christian Mauderer wrote:
>
> Hello Pranav,
>
> On 13/06/2021 20:00, Pranav Dangi wrote:
> > Building the RTEMS 5 docs using the waf build system fails and throws up
> > an error in sphinx:
> >
> > err:
> > Extension error:
> > You must configure the bibtex_bibfile
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 3:02 AM pranav wrote:
>
> Updated the link to the Raspberry Pi Firmware in RTEMS 5 docs, since the BSP
> works with an older version of the firmware currently.
> ---
> user/bsps/arm/raspberrypi.rst | 7 ---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --
Hi Jiri,
Thanks for the suggestion. It works. However, it looks like it just
simulates the instruction. I am looking for a cycle-accurate simulator and
can provide the performance information on each core. Do you know any?
Best,
Duc Anh
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 22:10, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
>
> On
ok.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 1:20 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Mention the type of the pointer in the parameter description. Use the
> more general term "object" instead of "variable".
>
> Update #3993.
> ---
> c-user/barrier/directives.rst | 15 +++
> c-user/clock/directives.rs
Hi Ida,
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 1:51 PM Ida Delphine wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> So I'm working on automatic style checking for RTEMS score and some time ago
> we agreed on using clang-format. Since I will be making some costum changes
> to the source code of clang-format, I intend using the rs
Converted printf statements to c++'s method of printing, adjusted to use
c++ file handling, changed char arrays to strings, fixed inconsistent
formatting.
---
tester/covoar/GcovData.cc | 388 +---
tester/covoar/GcovData.h | 32 +--
tester/covoar/GcovFu
Try the perf command. It will give you the load and performance per core. Sis
is fairly accurate for basic benchmarking ...-- Ursprungligt
meddelande--Från: Đức AnhDatum: mån 14 juni 2021 10:54Till: Jiri
Gaisler;Kopia: rtems-de...@rtems.org;Ämne:Re: Running SPARC/LEON3 in TSIM-LEON3
sim
On 8/6/21 10:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 08/06/2021 14:08, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Is the kernel rsb recipe fixed yet? That was a blocker.
>
> Is this really a blocker? Can't this be done on demand when someone wants to
> update them?
This depends on our shared view of supporting an eco-sy
On 15/06/2021 06:03, Chris Johns wrote:
On 8/6/21 10:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/06/2021 14:08, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is the kernel rsb recipe fixed yet? That was a blocker.
Is this really a blocker? Can't this be done on demand when someone wants to
update them?
This depends on our sh
On 14/06/2021 16:54, Gedare Bloom wrote:
ok.
Thanks, for having a look at it.
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Münc
On 15/6/21 3:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 15/06/2021 06:03, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 8/6/21 10:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2021 14:08, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is the kernel rsb recipe fixed yet? That was a blocker.
>>> Is this really a blocker? Can't this be done on demand wh
On 15/06/2021 07:50, Chris Johns wrote:
On 15/6/21 3:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 15/06/2021 06:03, Chris Johns wrote:
On 8/6/21 10:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/06/2021 14:08, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is the kernel rsb recipe fixed yet? That was a blocker.
Is this really a blocker? Ca
On 15/6/21 4:28 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 15/06/2021 07:50, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 15/6/21 3:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 15/06/2021 06:03, Chris Johns wrote:
On 8/6/21 10:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 08/06/2021 14:08, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Is the kernel rsb rec
On 15/06/2021 08:46, Chris Johns wrote:
If this is pushed through and the task it left for the "demand" queue it is
actually being placed on my queue because I am the one releasing RTEMS and I
think having these sorts of things resolved at release time is not great because
there is never enough t
16 matches
Mail list logo
