On 15/6/21 3:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/06/2021 06:03, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 8/6/21 10:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 08/06/2021 14:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>>> Is the kernel rsb recipe fixed yet? That was a blocker. >>> Is this really a blocker? Can't this be done on demand when someone wants to >>> update them? >> This depends on our shared view of supporting an eco-system. >> >> Support was added before we moved the build system to waf to build the >> kernel as >> part of a vertical software stack and this I consider important. > > I didn't say the contrary. What I don't agree with is the work package > ordering > and dependency chain. The time I wasted on keeping the build system zombie > more > or less alive I could have spent on updating the RSB.
No doubt. I am responding to your comment that this task can get done on demand. How does the ecosystem view of this fit into your "demand" driven view? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
