Does someone have any objections to this patch?
I would like to push it to master and 5.
Or should we reach out to someone at Gaisler to check if it is ok?
Best regards,
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: devel On Behalf Of
> gabriel.moy...@dlr.de
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 10:09
Hi Jan,
I think it is a correct analysis of the bad return value, when using
shared interrupt routines on the same interrupt source. I'm fine with
the patch, maybe it could have been simplified, like this:
+++ b/bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c
@@ -188,8 +188,8 @@ static int genirq_set_active(
Here the new patch as proposed by Daniel (thx btw).
It closes ticket 4385 (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4385#ticket).
Moyano, Gabriel (1):
grlib/genirq: Taking into account that it could be more than one ISR
enabled/disabled
bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 ins
---
bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c b/bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c
index 285416b0d3..ca80445c70 100644
--- a/bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c
+++ b/bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c
@@ -188,8 +188,8
Looks good.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 2021-04-15 11:52, Moyano, Gabriel wrote:
---
bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c b/bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c
index 285416b0d3..ca80445c70 100644
--- a
No one has posted publicly about these in 5 days and asking privately a
group of mvme users, I only got feedback from Heinz
==
I can only note that we have some (many) users who would like to stay at
the fixed 9600 baud because that is what
they have been used to since "forever”.
I had
Hello Gedare,
thanks for the review.
Best regards
Christian
Am 14.04.21 um 18:31 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
These two look good if no one complains go ahead. (I'm not 100% on
this libbsd stuff yet.)
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:21 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
Possible data sources for SD driver:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:22 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:40 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> >
> > On 15/4/21 5:22 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:10 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:36 PM Vijay Kumar Banerje
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:49 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:22 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:40 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> > >
> > > On 15/4/21 5:22 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:10 PM Gedare
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:36 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:49 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:22 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:40 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 15/4/21 5:22
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:20 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> looks good, other than the comment I made on the other patch about '${PREFIX}'
>
Pushed, thanks.
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:01 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >
> > Ping :)
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:51 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
It has been less than 3 days, still pinging it. :)
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
> ---
> bsp_drivers.py | 26 +-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bsp_drivers.py b/bsp_drivers.py
> index 3ca10c6..4a07847
Telnet patches already reverted. Is this good to go?
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
> ---
> netlegacy.py | 13 ++---
> testsuites/telnetd01/wscript | 5 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/netlegacy.p
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
> It has been less than 3 days, still pinging it. :)
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >
> > ---
> > bsp_drivers.py | 26 +-
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
> Telnet patches already reverted. Is this good to go?
>
Yes, except...
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >
> > ---
> > netlegacy.py | 13 ++---
> > testsuites/telnetd01/wscript
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >
> > It has been less than 3 days, still pinging it. :)
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > bsp_drivers.py | 26 +++
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > It has been less than 3 days, still pinging it. :)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:49 P
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:48 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >
> > Telnet patches already reverted. Is this good to go?
> >
> Yes, except...
>
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > ne
Hello all,
To revisit a little bit of a controversial subject :) The Python
Development Guidelines have been in place now for a little while, but
one thing that seems to have been missed entirely is guidance on
writing Python code that is OS-neutral. This mostly matters if someone
wants to try to
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:51 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It has been less than 3
On 16/4/21 6:58 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> To revisit a little bit of a controversial subject :) The Python
> Development Guidelines have been in place now for a little while, but
> one thing that seems to have been missed entirely is guidance on
> writing Python code that is OS-neut
Hello Gedare,
On 15/04/2021 22:58, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I guess we should define something to add here? Is anything written
somewhere we can adopt?
the spirit of the Python guide is to have rules which are enforced by
tools. If a certain component should run on platform X, then I think
some CI
Thanks, pushed to master and 5.
From: devel On Behalf Of Daniel Hellstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 1:03 PM
To: Moyano Heredia, Victor Gabriel ; devel@rtems.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] grlib/genirq: Taking into account that it could be
more than one ISR enabled/disabled
Looks good.
T
Update #3993.
---
c-user/semaphore/directives.rst | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/c-user/semaphore/directives.rst b/c-user/semaphore/directives.rst
index 54f40a4..7c2a9c8 100644
--- a/c-user/semaphore/directives.rst
+++ b/c-user/semaphore/directives.rst
@@ -525,9 +525,1
24 matches
Mail list logo
