On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:22 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vi...@rtems.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:40 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > > On 15/4/21 5:22 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:10 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:36 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vi...@rtems.org> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> --- > > >>> netlegacy.py | 27 +++++++++++++-------------- > > >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > >>> > > >>> diff --git a/netlegacy.py b/netlegacy.py > > >>> index 05cb78a..2936b8f 100644 > > >>> --- a/netlegacy.py > > >>> +++ b/netlegacy.py > > >>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ exclude_headers = ['rtems-bsd-user-space.h', 'rtems-bsd-kernel-space.h'] > > >>> > > >>> for root, dirs, files in os.walk("."): > > >>> [dirs.remove(d) for d in list(dirs) if d in exclude_dirs] > > >>> - dirs.append('./bsps/shared/net') > > >>> + dirs.append(os.path.join('bsps', 'shared', 'net')) > > >>> include_files[root[2:]] = [] > > >>> for name in files: > > >>> ext = os.path.splitext(name)[1] > > >>> @@ -59,10 +59,9 @@ def build(bld): > > >>> include_path = [] > > >>> ip = '' > > >>> bsp = bld.env.RTEMS_ARCH_BSP.split('-')[-1] > > >>> - pppd_source = [os.path.join('./pppd', s) > > >>> - for s in os.listdir('./pppd') if s[-2:] == '.c'] > > >>> - telnetd_source = [os.path.join('./telnetd', s) > > >>> - for s in os.listdir('telnetd') if s[-2:] == '.c'] > > >>> + pppd_source = [os.path.join('pppd', s) > > >>> + for s in os.listdir('pppd') > > >>> + if os.path.splitext(s)[1] == '.c'] > > >> This indentation looks wrong? > > >> > > > This looks good with git show. I'm not sure what happened here, maybe > > > it looks weird due to email formatting? > > > > Embedded tab character? > I'm not sure what's the issue here. Generally, git show output shows > any irregularity. This indentation looks right when I open it on mutt. > This is probably some issue with the email formatting. I see that some > of the removed codes in this patch also have crooked indentation but > they look properly indented upstream. > Hi,
Just wanted to add that I pushed the commit in my private repository and the indentation looks alright. Please have a look: https://git.rtems.org/vijay/rtems-net-legacy.git/commit/?id=c61fb1cf8517cb5d42568b48721056cf15a3bb40 Best regards, Vijay > > > > Chris
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel