Re: [PATCH rtems] dosfs: Fix memory leak on failed mounts.

On 4/8/20 4:29 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > Thanks for all Feedback. I integrated the changes suggested by > Sebastian, cretated the tickets and pushed to 5 and master. Thank you. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mai

Doubt in testsuite design on smp schedulers

Hi, I wanted to learn about how the reset function in the smpschededf02/init.c works/what it aims for. First , we set the priority of th

Re: Doubt in testsuite design on smp schedulers

Also, heir means something that would be executing later, after the current thread leaves cpu, right? Why is it then that we are checking against is_idle not against cpu->executing but for cpu->heir? Please let me kn

[PATCH] smpschededf02: Document reset() function

--- testsuites/smptests/smpschededf02/init.c | 14 +- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smpschededf02/init.c b/testsuites/smptests/smpschededf02/init.c index cd8895edd5..fae2d76bf3 100644 --- a/testsuites/smptests/smpschededf02/init.c ++

Re: Doubt in testsuite design on smp schedulers

Hello Richi, please have a look at: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061112.html ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH] smpschededf02: Document reset() function

This helps. Thank you. On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 3:58 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > --- > testsuites/smptests/smpschededf02/init.c | 14 +- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smpschededf02/init.c > b

unused static functions

Dear RTEMS developers Team, i am a new member focusing now on fixing the GCC10 warnings Compiler.this last has told that these both functions are declared but not used. In /rtems/testsuites/libtests/dl10/dl-load.c,the test file includes this both functions without further use. that can generate

legacy stack or libbsd

I'm trying to figure out when compiling a third party software (EPICS), whether the RTEMS for a target bsp was created with the legacy stack or uses the libbsd stack. Unfortunately I have found some different definitions: in target.cfg : RTEMS_HAS_NETWORKING in bsp.cfg : HAS_NETWORKING in header

Re: legacy stack or libbsd

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:10 AM Heinz Junkes wrote: > I'm trying to figure out when compiling a third party software (EPICS), > whether the RTEMS for a target bsp was created with the legacy stack or > uses the libbsd stack. > > Unfortunately I have found some different definitions: > > in target.

Re: [PATCH] smpschededf02: Document reset() function

On 04/08/2020 14:25, Richi Dubey wrote: This helps. Thank you. If things are still unclear, don't hesitate to ask again. Your questions are really helpful to improve the documentation. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/ma

Doubt in scheduler SMP function _Scheduler_SMP_Schedule_highest_ready

Hi, I have a quick doubt about the logic in the else part of the _Scheduler_SMP_Schedule_highest_ready function. We get

Explanation about the high level design choices of Strong APA

Hi, Implementing the Strong APA scheduler requires finding places to put the two most important algorithms (pages 5 and 6 from the paper ) in the current RTEMS SMP scheduler framework. I have chosen get_highest_ready and get_lowest_ready to

Re: [PATCH] smpschededf02: Document reset() function

Thanks. So for the code: -- for (i = 0; i < CPU_COUNT; ++i) { const Per_CPU_Control *c; const Thread_Control *h; c = _Per_CPU_Get_by_index(CPU_COUNT - 1 - i); h = c->heir; sc = r

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd 2/2] wscript: add uninstall command

Hi Chris, Is this patch OK to push to the master? On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:51 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > --- > wscript | 5 - > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/wscript b/wscript > index 3ca9478e..74fc1f48 100644 > --- a/wscript > +++ b/wscript > @@ -

Re: Doubt in scheduler SMP function _Scheduler_SMP_Schedule_highest_ready

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:14 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a quick doubt about the logic in the else part of the > _Scheduler_SMP_Schedule_highest_ready function. > I'll give my understanding. Only Sebastian really understands this stuff ;) > We get the action == SCHEDULER_TRY_TO_SCHED

Re: legacy stack or libbsd

Because the libbsd stack does not support some things yet (e.g. ntp) I have to call different functions at rtems_init in EPICS. Therefore, when building EPICS for a target, I need to know which stack the target was built with. Viele Grüße Heinz Junkes -- Experience directly varies with equipme

Re: unused static functions

Hello Aschref Ben thabet, On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:35 AM Aschref Ben-Thabet wrote: > > Dear RTEMS developers Team, > i am a new member focusing now on fixing the GCC10 warnings Compiler.this > last has told that these both functions are declared but not used. > In /rtems/testsuites/libtests/dl10

Re: unused static functions

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:12 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Hello Aschref Ben thabet, > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:35 AM Aschref Ben-Thabet > wrote: > > > > Dear RTEMS developers Team, > > i am a new member focusing now on fixing the GCC10 warnings > Compiler.this last has told that these both functio

Re: GSoC 2020: OFW Import To RTEMS License Issue

ping. On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 2:11 PM Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 1:37 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 2:16 PM Niteesh G. S. >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> In a recent review of these patches >>> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-Jul

Re: [PATCH RTEMS 7/7] libtests/openfirmware: Added a testsuite for openfirmware

Ping. On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 2:44 PM Niteesh G. S. wrote: > Hello, > > I went through some of my previous conversations to summarize the various > directories > suggested by people. Maybe this will help to come up with a conclusion. > > In my first porting commit, I placed the files under cpukit

Re: GSoC 2020: OFW Import To RTEMS License Issue

I think for this one we can only hope that the original author agrees to a re-licensing. Otherwise it is only possible to add a replacement. On 04/08/2020 20:34, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > ping. > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 2:11 PM Niteesh G. S. > wrote: > > > >

Re: [PATCH RTEMS 7/7] libtests/openfirmware: Added a testsuite for openfirmware

Hello, I think the big question is: Should we make that a public API and keep it in cpukit or should we make it a BSP support code and move ti to the bsps/shared section? Sebastian and Gedare: Like Niteesh said: There have been some different directions in the past. Which one should be the target

Re: GSoC 2020: OFW Import To RTEMS License Issue

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:38 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > I think for this one we can only hope that the original author agrees to > a re-licensing. Otherwise it is only possible to add a replacement. > I suggest starting to make a plan for a clean room re-implementation. Ideally, one entity

[rtems-libbsd] Question how to treat necessary changes from freebsd master

Hello, I have now a patchset ready which should also properly enable the e1000 driver for the master branch of rtems-libbsd. There is just a small problem: The commit the current freebsd-org submodule points to has this line in the e1000/if_em.c (https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/6b0307a

Updates of Smart India Hackathon 2020 Finale

Hello everyone! I feel elated to share with the community that my Team 'Altruist' won the first Prize in the Grand Finale of the World's Biggest Hackathon - Smart India Hackathon 2020! We will not only be awarded with INR 100,000 but also the Government of India will help us to scale our project!

Re: Updates of Smart India Hackathon 2020 Finale

On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 2:18 AM Mritunjay Sharma < mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I feel elated to share with the community that my Team 'Altruist' > won the first Prize in the Grand Finale of the World's > Biggest Hackathon - Smart India Hackathon 2020! We will not > on

Re: Updates of Smart India Hackathon 2020 Finale

Congratulations! That's awesome! On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:01 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 2:18 AM Mritunjay Sharma < > mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello everyone! >> >> I feel elated to share with the community that my Team 'Altruist' >> won the first Prize i

Re: Updates of Smart India Hackathon 2020 Finale

Well done, that is a great result. On 5/8/20 8:13 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Congratulations! That's awesome! > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:01 PM Eshan Dhawan > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 2:18 AM Mritunjay Sharma > mailto:mritunjaysharma...@gm

Re: unused static functions

On 5/8/20 3:28 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:12 AM Gedare Bloom > wrote: > > Hello Aschref Ben thabet, > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:35 AM Aschref Ben-Thabet > > wrote: > > > > D

Re: legacy stack or libbsd

On 5/8/20 2:04 am, Heinz Junkes wrote: > Because the libbsd stack does not support some things yet (e.g. ntp) I have PTP running on libbsd. I currently have no time (ha) to clean up the work and create a patch. It requires some extra support in the score. > I have to call different > functions

Re: legacy stack or libbsd

On 5/8/20 10:23 am, Chris Johns wrote: > On 5/8/20 2:04 am, Heinz Junkes wrote: >> Because the libbsd stack does not support some things yet (e.g. ntp) > > I have PTP running on libbsd. I currently have no time (ha) to clean up the > work > and create a patch. It requires some extra support in t

Re: legacy stack or libbsd

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:41 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 5/8/20 10:23 am, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 5/8/20 2:04 am, Heinz Junkes wrote: > >> Because the libbsd stack does not support some things yet (e.g. ntp) > > > > I have PTP running on libbsd. I currently have no time (ha) to clean up the > >

Re: [PATCH] smpschededf02: Document reset() function

On 04/08/2020 16:23, Richi Dubey wrote: Thanks. So for the code: --   for (i = 0; i < CPU_COUNT; ++i) {     const Per_CPU_Control *c;     const Thread_Control *h;     c = _Per_CPU_Get_by_index(CP

Re: legacy stack or libbsd

On 5/8/20 2:13 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:41 PM Chris Johns wrote: >> >> On 5/8/20 10:23 am, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 5/8/20 2:04 am, Heinz Junkes wrote: Because the libbsd stack does not support some things yet (e.g. ntp) >>> >>> I have PTP running on libbsd. I curre

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd 2/2] wscript: add uninstall command

On 5/8/20 1:52 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Is this patch OK to push to the master? Yes, please push. I am sorry about the slow review. Thanks Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel