On 04/08/2020 16:23, Richi Dubey wrote:
Thanks.So for the code: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- for (i = 0; i < CPU_COUNT; ++i) { const Per_CPU_Control *c; const Thread_Control *h; c = _Per_CPU_Get_by_index(CPU_COUNT - 1 - i); h = c->heir; sc = rtems_task_suspend(h->Object.id); rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL); } -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- would it have the same effect if we replace all this by : for (i = CPU_COUNT -1 ; i >=0 ; --i) { sc = rtems_task_suspend(ctx->task_ids[i]); rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL); } -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please let me know.
No, it would not have the same effect in general. You can try to change it and see if the test fails or not.
-- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
