On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 2:36 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, 3:46 PM Eshan Dhawan
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>> I went through the currently available tests
>> they lack the test for functions
>> •imaxabs()
>> • imaxdiv()
>> Please tell that If any other function whose tes
Hi,
This looks good. I will test it tomorrow and let you know how it goes.
Thanks
Chris
On 2020-03-29 08:59, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
Update #3909
---
wscript | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/wscript b/wscript
index e0a7e9f7..3ca9478e 100644
---
---
testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 24 +---
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c
b/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c
index 030aa2aa57..82a9c128fe 100644
--- a/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes0
I have sent a patch related to it for adding methods
link : https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-March/058727.html
-Eshan
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 3:07 PM Eshan Dhawan
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 2:36 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, 3:46 PM Eshan Dhawan
Hello,
While reading carefully, I can't completely understand regarding "high-level
management utility" Can you please elaborate on what is being asked or
referenced?
Regards
Anmol Mishra
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/ma
On 2020-03-30 00:43 +0530, Anmol Mishra wrote:
> Hello,
> While reading carefully, I can't completely understand regarding "high-level
> management utility"??Can you please elaborate on what is being asked or
> referenced?
Most if not all the utilities currently exist in their own respective s
On 2020-03-29 22:09, Chris Johns wrote:
This looks good. I will test it tomorrow and let you know how it goes.
Tested and it resolves the problem I was seeing. I will push this to
master and 5-freebsd12 and update the RSB to pull this into the RSB
build of libbsd.
Thank you for generating t
Hi,
Sorry about the delay in answering this email.
Test Executor
- Why create a new name for something that exists? We have the name
RTEMS Tester, it is present and exists. If you use and extend what is
present you will have a better chance of it being accepted. Presenting
competing function
I have added/rectified all the valuable changes provided by the community
in my proposal. In particular, I have added the implementation of TYM in my
draft. It would be very kind of you if you could have a final glance at the
proposal before I submit the final pdf draft.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 7:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020, 5:47 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 2020-03-29 22:09, Chris Johns wrote:
> > This looks good. I will test it tomorrow and let you know how it goes.
>
> Tested and it resolves the problem I was seeing. I will push this to
> master and 5-freebsd12 and update the RSB to pull this i
Hello Siegfried,
On 27/03/2020 23:34, Siegfried Giebl wrote:
I am looking for interrupt latency numbers for PowerPC architectures,
if possible for e500v2.
Looking at below postings, there is a mentioning of "TBD" microseconds
as maximum period ... and a variable "na" to describe the value of MH
On 28/03/2020 19:47, Niteesh G. S. wrote:
We have an Installation chapter under the User manual
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/installation/index.html
But it isn't detailed enough like the quick start guide. IMO it is the
right place to add detailed instructions. It already has imp
12 matches
Mail list logo
