I have sent a patch related to it for adding methods link : https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-March/058727.html
-Eshan On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 3:07 PM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 2:36 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, 3:46 PM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> I went through the currently available tests >>> they lack the test for functions >>> •imaxabs() >>> • imaxdiv() >>> Please tell that If any other function whose test is to be added. >>> >> Test for other functions were already written last year by @Vaibhav Gupta > <vaibhav.varo...@gmail.com> > Only these 2 are left for inttypes.h > I will send a patch for the two methods test I think in a way could be > implemented. > Since they don't have any exceptions so I thought of directly verifying > the result. > I will go through the sources for tests as well. > >> >> If we knew, there would either be tests or tickets. :) >> >> File a ticket with the appropriate tags to have it show up in the POSIX >> compliance list and add it to your project if you like. >> >> On a vaguely related note, there is the open POSIX test suite ( >> http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/) and glibc's test suite. In theory >> they should be able to run against RTEMS. In practice, I have no idea if or >> how hard it would be to get them to run and to investigate failures to mark >> some as expected. Some test frameworks assume fork and exec. Just throwing >> this out. >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Eshan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> devel@rtems.org >>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
