Re: [PATCH] rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c: LibBSD init now uses all pass levels.

Hi, BUS_PASS_BUS + BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST equals BUS_PASS_BUS, cause BUS_PASS_ORDER_FIRST is defined 0. So this is just cosmetical but you are right I should add this. Best, Nils On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 20:33, Christian Mauderer wrote: > Hello Nils, > > thanks for the patch. It sounds like we wil

[PATCH v2 2/2] rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c: LibBSD init now uses all pass levels.

I observed all Modules loading in the last fdt pass. The reason was, nexus bus loading with BUS_PASS_DEFAULT. --- rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c b/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c ind

[PATCH v2] rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c: LibBSD init now uses all pass levels.

I observed all Modules loading in the last fdt pass. The reason was, nexus bus loading with BUS_PASS_DEFAULT. --- rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c b/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c ind

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c: LibBSD init now uses all pass levels.

Hi, Sorry can some one help me? I create the v2 Patch with: $git format-patch -v2 origin/master And send the mail with: $git send-email v2-0001-rtems-rtems-kernel-nexus.c-LibBSD-init-now-uses-a.patch --to devel@rtems.org Why is the patch send to the v1 mail? Best, Nils On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 1

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems/rtems-kernel-nexus.c: LibBSD init now uses all pass levels.

On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 2:22 PM Nils Hölscher wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry can some one help me? > I create the v2 Patch with: > $git format-patch -v2 origin/master > > And send the mail with: > $git send-email > v2-0001-rtems-rtems-kernel-nexus.c-LibBSD-init-now-uses-a.patch --to > devel@rtems.org > >

Re: RTEMS Source Builder failed for MX Linux

Hi Chris, Here is the patch file you requested for the changes that I have made to sb/linux.py and defaults.mc Thanks Himanshu From 205fcd98c6f9d1f012b2a97c47b2ba8b6ff1feea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Himanshu40 Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 16:55:08 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Changes made to source dir

Re: Problem: RSB does no longer install stand-alone sis

The problem comes from a commit to source-builder/config/sis-2-1.cfg, made on July 23. If I revert that, installation works again. If nobody objects, I will push a revert in about an hour and we can debug this at a later stage. Jiri. On 8/9/19 2:34 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 9/8/19 7:59 am, Geda

Re: RISC-V Test Results

On 8/8/19 3:33 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > If you are subscribed to the build@ mailing list, then you saw the > flurry of test > results from over night. I built every variant and ran the test suite > with RTEMS  > debug on and off.  Here are some observations: > > + rv64imafd only has one t

Re: Problem: RSB does no longer install stand-alone sis

On 10/8/19 11:17 pm, Jiri Gaisler wrote: > The problem comes from a commit to source-builder/config/sis-2-1.cfg, > made on July 23. I am aware this is the problem and a revert may work for you but I seem to remember it did a problem but I cannot remember what. :) I would prefer we have the confi

Re: RTEMS Source Builder failed for MX Linux

On 10/8/19 9:41 pm, Himanshu Sekhar Nayak wrote: > > Here is the patch file you requested for the changes that I have made to > sb/linux.py and defaults.mc > Thank you. Can you please move the changes in `defaults.mc` to `linux.py` in a section that is specific to MX Linux?

Re: RTEMS Source Builder failed for MX Linux

Also does there need to be a new section in the Users Guide on what host packages need to be installed? On Sat, Aug 10, 2019, 8:17 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 10/8/19 9:41 pm, Himanshu Sekhar Nayak wrote: > > > > Here is the patch file you requested for the changes that I have made to > > sb/linu

Re: RTEMS Source Builder failed for MX Linux

On 11/8/19 11:54 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Also does there need to be a new section in the Users Guide on what host > packages need to be installed? Yes the documentation needs to be updated to add this distro. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.

Re: RISC-V Test Results

On 9/8/19 9:47 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/08/2019 15:33, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> Hi >> >> If you are subscribed to the build@ mailing list, then you saw the flurry of >> test >> results from over night. I built every variant and ran the test suite with >> RTEMS >> debug on and off.  Here