Re: PlantUML and rtems-docs

I noticed also that we don't use the sphinxcontrib-plantuml extension: https://pypi.org/project/sphinxcontrib-plantuml/ Should we use it? It would enable the use of images in *.pdf format for the Latex output. The PNGs are quite ugly in the Latex output. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains Gmb

Re: PlantUML and rtems-docs

On 11/6/19 5:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > I noticed also that we don't use the sphinxcontrib-plantuml extension: > > https://pypi.org/project/sphinxcontrib-plantuml/ > > Should we use it? It would enable the use of images in *.pdf format for the > Latex output. The PNGs are quite ugly in the L

Re: [PATCH] Basic Support for Trace Compass

> > Yes, it would be good to have a worked out example, however, the general > description should be independent of this. > The trace stream received on the host was only possible after applying the two patches in the root directory of rtems-libbsd and rtems-tools. I mean it is not from the master

Re: PlantUML and rtems-docs

On 11/06/2019 10:21, Chris Johns wrote: On 11/6/19 5:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: I noticed also that we don't use the sphinxcontrib-plantuml extension: https://pypi.org/project/sphinxcontrib-plantuml/ Should we use it? It would enable the use of images in *.pdf format for the Latex output. T

Re: PlantUML and rtems-docs

On 11/6/19 4:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > I built the rtems-docs with the following configuration: > > ./waf configure --pdf --plantuml > > It rebuilt several *.png files: > > Changes not staged for commit: >   (use "git add ..." to update what will be committed) >   (use "git che

Re: [PATCH] Basic Support for Trace Compass

On 11/06/2019 10:22, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote: Yes, it would be good to have a worked out example, however, the general description should be independent of this. The trace stream received on the host was only possible after applying the two patches in the root directory of rtem

Re: PlantUML and rtems-docs

On 11/6/19 6:27 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 11/06/2019 10:21, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 11/6/19 5:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> I noticed also that we don't use the sphinxcontrib-plantuml extension: >>> >>> https://pypi.org/project/sphinxcontrib-plantuml/ >>> >>> Should we use it? It would e

Re: PlantUML and rtems-docs

On 11/06/2019 10:27, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 11/06/2019 10:21, Chris Johns wrote: On 11/6/19 5:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: I noticed also that we don't use the sphinxcontrib-plantuml extension: https://pypi.org/project/sphinxcontrib-plantuml/ Should we use it? It would enable the use of i

Re: [PATCH] Basic Support for Trace Compass

> > These patches are not the production side. Is it good to talk about > > patches here? > > Just use your GSoC branches as a reference. In the end it should work > with the upstream master branches as is without external patches. > > Okay I have added the event recording example and made a push

Re: PlantUML and rtems-docs

On 11/6/19 7:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 11/06/2019 10:27, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 11/06/2019 10:21, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 11/6/19 5:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: I noticed also that we don't use the sphinxcontrib-plantuml extension: https://pypi.org/project/sphinxcon

[PATCH v3 5/8] rtemstoolkit/configuration: Add get_sections() to get the sections.

From: Chris Johns - Fix module access when catching exceptions. --- rtemstoolkit/configuration.py | 28 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py b/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py index 3b03296..bc3ec93 100644 --- a/rt

[PATCH v3 3/8] rtemstoolkit/log: Add info().

From: Chris Johns --- rtemstoolkit/log.py | 14 ++ rtemstoolkit/options.py | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/log.py b/rtemstoolkit/log.py index a06c8c1..00fdb05 100755 --- a/rtemstoolkit/log.py +++ b/rtemstoolkit/log.py @@ -61,

[PATCH v3 4/8] rtemstoolkit/path: Merge RSB changes.

From: Chris Johns --- rtemstoolkit/path.py | 294 ++- 1 file changed, 233 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/path.py b/rtemstoolkit/path.py index 845dfe8..9401e99 100644 --- a/rtemstoolkit/path.py +++ b/rtemstoolkit/path.py @@ -40,37

[PATCH v3 2/8] rtemstoolkit/host: Make the load() public.

From: Chris Johns --- rtemstoolkit/host.py | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/host.py b/rtemstoolkit/host.py index 5319c92..01aae07 100644 --- a/rtemstoolkit/host.py +++ b/rtemstoolkit/host.py @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ is_windows = False platform =

[PATCH v3 1/8] rtemstoolkit/check: Optionally check exe silently.

From: Chris Johns --- rtemstoolkit/check.py | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/check.py b/rtemstoolkit/check.py index 8d4a35c..1f18f72 100644 --- a/rtemstoolkit/check.py +++ b/rtemstoolkit/check.py @@ -143,12 +143,12 @@ def host_setup(opts):

[PATCH v3 7/8] rtemstoolkit/configuration: Fix interpolation support.

From: Chris Johns - It was disabled always. Now optional by the constructor. --- rtemstoolkit/configuration.py | 78 --- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py b/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py index bc3ec93..29

[PATCH v3 6/8] rtemstoolkit/macros: Improve the macro output.

From: Chris Johns - Support optionally reporting just the keys and their values. --- rtemstoolkit/macros.py | 30 ++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/macros.py b/rtemstoolkit/macros.py index d6a3563..d8012e1 100644 --- a/rtem

[PATCH v3 8/8] misc/boot-image: Add a tool to create boot images.

From: Chris Johns - FreeBSD support. - MacOS support. - Linux support. - Support for 1st and 2nd loaders. - Support uenv templates and uenv.txt support. --- misc/rtems-boot-image| 42 ++ misc/tools/boot.py | 1156 ++ misc/tools/cmd-boot-ima

Re: [PATCH] Add testsuite for psxinttypes01

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:38 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:01 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> Hi Vaibhav, >> >> This is getting better, see below for review comments. >> >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:48 AM Vaibhav Gupta >> wrote: >> > + puts( "2 - Valid Inputs - Negat

[PATCH]Re:RAP File load error

I found the problem is: rtems_rtl_elf_relocate_rel() change the return value, but rtl-rap.c:412 still check the return value as bool, so the RAP load failed. I make a patch about this. -- Original -- From: "jameszxj"; Date: Tue, Jun 11, 2019 09:18 AM To: "devel"

[PATCH] user: Add the boot image tool command.

From: Chris Johns --- user/tools/boot-image.rst | 445 ++ user/tools/index.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 446 insertions(+) create mode 100644 user/tools/boot-image.rst diff --git a/user/tools/boot-image.rst b/user/tools/boot-image.rst new file mode 1006

Re: [PATCH]Re:RAP File load error

On 12/6/19 2:15 pm, jameszxj wrote: > I found the problem Awesome. > is: rtems_rtl_elf_relocate_rel() change the return value, > but rtl-rap.c:412 still check the return value as bool, so the RAP load > failed. > > I make a patch about this. The patch look good however I need a patch generated

Re: [PATCH]Re:RAP File load error

I commit and create a patch use sourcetree, is this ok? -- Original -- From: "Chris Johns"; Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2019 12:26 PM To: "jameszxj";"devel"; Subject: Re: [PATCH]Re:RAP File load error On 12/6/19 2:15 pm, jameszxj wrote: > I found the problem Awesome.