On 11/6/19 7:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 11/06/2019 10:27, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 11/06/2019 10:21, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 11/6/19 5:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> I noticed also that we don't use the sphinxcontrib-plantuml extension: >>>> >>>> https://pypi.org/project/sphinxcontrib-plantuml/ >>>> >>>> Should we use it? It would enable the use of images in *.pdf format for the >>>> Latex output. The PNGs are quite ugly in the Latex output. >>> Sure, it looks good. Does it support ditaa? >> >> I had some problems to set it up. It didn't work with the Node.js "puml" >> command. I had to use the Java archive. I didn't test the ditaa input so far. >> > > Using this extension forces you to install PlantUML and its dependencies to > build the documentation. Also debugging problems in the PlantUML content is > not > that great.
Ok and thanks. > Maybe we should concentrate on fixing the *.puml -> *.png generation so that > it > is not always updated and doesn't depend on timestamps. I think Waf uses a hash on files. > We should also generate *.pdf files for the Latex output. Sure. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
