Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:40 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:24 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019, 12:45 PM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > >> > >> I did cloned RTEM source, newlib and rtems-libbsd. > >> Kept them in same folder so as to get easy with 'gre

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

Ticket no #3650 https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3650 The header file is present in newlib: $ find ./ -name \ipc.h ./newlib-cygwin/winsup/cygwin/include/sys/ipc.h ./newlib-cygwin/winsup/cygwin/include/cygwin/ipc.h ./newlib-cygwin/newlib/libc/sys/phoenix/sys/ipc.h . and ./newlib-cygwin/winsup/cygwin/

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

Ticket no #2971 https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2971 The header file is present in newlib: $ find ./ -name \fenv.h ./newlib-cygwin/winsup/cygwin/include/fenv.h ./newlib-cygwin/newlib/libc/machine/spu/sys/fenv.h ./newlib-cygwin/newlib/libc/machine/spu/include/fenv.h ./newlib-cygwin/newlib/libc/mach

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

Okay, i read the header file, the functions defined in https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/posix-compliance/posix-compliance.html#id396 are still missing. . Can they be taken up for SoC project? On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 7:19 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > Ticket no #2971 https://devel.rtems.org/tic

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:40 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:24 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019, 12:45 PM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > >> > >> I did cloned RTEM source, newlib and rtems-libbsd. > >> Kept them in same folder so as to get easy with 'gre

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:49 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > Ticket no #2971 https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2971 > > The header file is present in newlib: > > $ find ./ -name \fenv.h > ./newlib-cygwin/winsup/cygwin/include/fenv.h > ./newlib-cygwin/newlib/libc/machine/spu/sys/fenv.h > ./newlib-cygwin/ne

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:06 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > Okay, i read the header file, the functions defined in > > https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/posix-compliance/posix-compliance.html#id396 > are still missing. > . > Can they be taken up for SoC project? > Yep. As I tried to make clear o

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:07 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:40 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:24 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019, 12:45 PM Vaibhav Gupta >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I did cloned RTEM source, newlib and

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:51 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:06 AM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > >> Okay, i read the header file, the functions defined in >> >> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/posix-compliance/posix-compliance.html#id396 >> are still missing. >> . >> Ca

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

Under "Tasks without Tickets": https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2966#TasksWithoutTickets . . Newlib also has some known issues: - math.h missing some methods - long double complex methods. These could come from FreeBSD but we need to be careful since there may be architecture specifi

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:29 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:51 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:06 AM Vaibhav Gupta >> wrote: >> >>> Okay, i read the header file, the functions defined in >>> >>> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/posix-

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:01 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > Under "Tasks without Tickets": > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2966#TasksWithoutTickets > . > . > > Newlib also has some known issues: > >- math.h missing some methods > - long double complex methods. These could come from FreeBSD

Re: rtems-libbsd build error

Hi Christian, On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 at 14:30, Christian Mauderer wrote: > Am 16.03.19 um 23:52 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 at 01:00, Christian Mauderer > > wrote: > > > > Am 15.03.19 um 19:20 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > >

Re: rtems-libbsd build error

On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 00:56, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > (it got sent by mistake :) ) Thanks for telling about the script, now I have the code imported and it's building successfully. I have forked the repo and created a branch with my commits. Please have a look and see i

Re: rtems-libbsd build error

Am 18.03.19 um 20:31 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 00:56, Vijay Kumar Banerjee > mailto:vijaykumar9...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Hi Christian, > > (it got sent by mistake :) ) > > Thanks for telling about the script, now I have the code imported and > it's b

Re: [PATCH] Add rtems_board_support_package()

On 14/3/19 12:41 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 13/03/2019 14:39, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:38 AM Sebastian Huber >> > > wrote: >> >>     What about this patch? The placement of rtems_board_support_package() >>     into is a bit o

Re: erc32 dl09 Failure

On 16/3/19 4:43 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > Is this the way this test fails when the BSP doesn't have enough memory? Correct, this is a test where a lot of memory is needed. The test has to make sure the code is loaded at offsets that are greater than the relative offsets in the generated c

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add the T Test Framework

Hi, I am not sure how this fits in with what we have so before I can support any changes of this scale and direction I need to understand: 1. Are all existing tests to be converted to this new framework? 2. How does this effect the existing eco-system support such as the `rtems-test` command and

Re: [PATCH 1/1] eng: Add software test framework chapter

On 14/3/19 9:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Update #3199. > --- > eng/index.rst |3 + > eng/test-framework.rst | 2077 > > 2 files changed, 2080 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 eng/test-framework.rst > > diff --git a/eng/index.rs