On 14/3/19 12:41 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 13/03/2019 14:39, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:38 AM Sebastian Huber >> <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >> <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: >> >> What about this patch? The placement of rtems_board_support_package() >> into <rtems/version.h> is a bit odd, but I think it fits into the >> scope >> of these functions. You normally include <rtems/version.h> if you >> want >> to print some system information. Another place would be <rtems.h> >> right >> after rtems_get_version_string(). >> >> I think it is OK although I agree with you it is odd.
+1 >> >> If these are intended to be public APIs, I do not see any documentation for >> them in rtems-docs. > > All functions in this header are not in rtems-docs so far. I guess the primary > use case is test meta-data output. > This can also be useful for users for the same reasons we find it useful. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
