I used -O2. Is there some standard floating point test that would be a better
gauge?
Kevin Kirspel
Electrical Engineer - Sr. Staff
Opti Medical
235 Hembree Park Drive
Roswell GA 30076
Tel: (770)-510- ext. 81642
Direct: (770)-688-1642
Fax: (770)-510-4445
-Original Message-
From: Seba
On 22/08/16 13:23, Kirspel, Kevin wrote:
I used -O2.
Did you look at the generated code? I guess you find no calls to the
standard math library functions. Which timing numbers do you get if you
use "-O2 -fno-builtin" instead?
Is there some standard floating point test that would be a bet
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Sorry, for being so pedantic, but it will be probably me who updates the
> libbsd with about 800 files to next FreeBSD versions. Please go through
> your complete patch series again and fix all places
Here is the updated metrics with -fno-builtin. You are right in the sense that
the generated code did not call the underlying math functions. I will generate
a patch for the hard implementation.
softp - 4493 ms
hard - 4263 ms
Kevin Kirspel
Electrical Engineer - Sr. Staff
Opti Medical
235 Hemb
diff --git
a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-6-20160609-newlib-2.4.0.20160527-1.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-6-20160609-newlib-2.4.0.20160527-1.cfg
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 66c83b9..8639083
--- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-6-20160609-newlib-2.4.0.20160527-1.cfg
+++ b/rtems/confi
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc32xx/make/custom/lpc32xx.inc
b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc32xx/make/custom/lpc32xx.inc
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index f184741..441976d
--- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc32xx/make/custom/lpc32xx.inc
+++ b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc32xx/make/custom/lpc32xx.inc
@@ -
