Re: [PATCH v2] Add RTEMS linker sets

Push it, if there is problem in the doc we can make a GCI task to fix ;) Lot of patches may come in with BSP modifications (removal, doxygen), so feel free to merge relatively quickly On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > If nobody complains, then I will commit this tomorrow,

Re: [PATCH 2/2] score: Delete unused API extensions

Seems fine, is there any associated documentation/doxygen to update? On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Update #2408. > --- > cpukit/sapi/src/exinit.c | 7 --- > cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/apiext.h | 28 +--- > cpukit/scor

Re: [PATCH 2/2] score: Delete unused API extensions

Nvm I see the doxy in the patch, didn't at first. OK On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Seems fine, is there any associated documentation/doxygen to update? > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> Update #2408. >> --- >> cpukit/sapi/src/exinit.c

Linker Set Based Initialization

Hello, I checked in the support for linker sets (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2408). Please review the API https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/score/include/rtems/linkersets.h and documentation https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/doc/user/linkersets.t carefully. For an example please ha

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

What BSPs/architectures have you tested? Is this something that breaks on a per BSP basis? or per architecture basis? I am assuming that since it is linker based, each BSP could have broken linkcmds. Is that right? --joel On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: What BSPs/architectures have you tested? I temporarily moved the splinkersets01 test to the samples/ticker and tested that all BSPs build and link this test. I executed the splinkersets01 test on sis, psim and arm_realview_pbx_a9_qemu. Is this som

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On 08/12/15 16:09, Sebastian Huber wrote: Is this something that breaks on a per BSP basis? or per architecture basis? I am assuming that since it is linker based, each BSP could have broken linkcmds. Is that right? It breaks on a per linker command file basis. Since all the maintained BSP

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> What BSPs/architectures have you tested? >> > > I temporarily moved the splinkersets01 test to the samples/ticker and > tested that all BSPs build and link th

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >>> What BSPs/architectures have you tested? >> >> >> I temporarily moved the splinkersets01 test to the samples/ticker and >> tes

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > >> > >> On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >>> > >>> What BSPs/architectures have you tested? > >> > >> > >

[PATCH 1/2] m68k/mvme136: Remove

updates #2444. --- c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mvme136/Makefile.am | 62 --- c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mvme136/bsp_specs| 13 -- c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mvme136/clock/ckinit.c | 114 c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mvme136/configure.ac | 20 --- c/src/lib/libbsp/m6

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

We can also route student questions to here if we don't know the answers. On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Se

Fwd: [PATCH 1/2] m68k/mvme136: Remove

Made a mistake, ignore this patch. Forwarded message >From : Aun-Ali Zaidi To : Cc : "Aun-Ali Zaidi" Date : Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:35:51 -0600 Subject : [PATCH 1/2] m68k/mvme136: Remove Forwarded messa

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

Hello Joel, before you start with wild guessing, please look at the patch: https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=b618d8cfc54f84d4ed03dc7b7fa510c872e6128a - Am 8. Dez 2015 um 16:45 schrieb Joel Sherrill : > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-bra

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

- Am 8. Dez 2015 um 16:03 schrieb Joel Sherrill : > What BSPs/architectures have you tested? I will test the with the attached patch tomorrow on all BSPs. This patch adds a link time test to ticker. This test verifies that the linker command file modifications for the RTEMS linker sets are

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

Sorry. I didn't see that patch get committed this morning and didn't realize it addressed the issue. When you said, BSPs needed to use linkcmds.base and not cut and paste, I took that to mean you hadn't touched any other BSPs. I will try to test some on BSPs you didn't. Is the ticker addition jus

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

- Am 8. Dez 2015 um 21:24 schrieb Joel Sherrill j...@rtems.org: > Sorry. I didn't see that patch get committed this morning and didn't realize > it addressed the issue. When you said, BSPs needed to use linkcmds.base > and not cut and paste, I took that to mean you hadn't touched any other >

[PATCH] rtems/bit_rtems: Remove reference to score603e.

Closes #2458. --- rtems/bit_all_bsps | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rtems/bit_all_bsps b/rtems/bit_all_bsps index fb30675..d0bbb1a 100755 --- a/rtems/bit_all_bsps +++ b/rtems/bit_all_bsps @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ get_bsps() mips)all_bsps="jmr3904 genmongo

[PATCH] powerpc/score603e: Remove (obselete).

Updates #2458. --- c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/acinclude.m4 | 2 - c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/score603e/Makefile.am | 77 c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/score603e/PCI_bus/PCI.c | 102 - c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/score603e/PCI_bus/PCI.h | 42 -- c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/score6

[PATCH] rtems/bit_all_bsps: Remove ep1a reference

closes #2457. --- rtems/bit_all_bsps | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rtems/bit_all_bsps b/rtems/bit_all_bsps index d0bbb1a..5a6e024 100755 --- a/rtems/bit_all_bsps +++ b/rtems/bit_all_bsps @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ get_bsps() all_bsps="${all_bsps} rbtx

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/ep1a: Remove

Hello Aun-Ali, thanks, I committed the patch with a slight modification. On 09/12/15 05:01, Aun-Ali Zaidi wrote: @@ -38,12 +36,12 @@ AC_DEFUN([RTEMS_CHECK_BSPDIR], AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS([t32mppc]);; tqm8xx ) AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS([tqm8xx]);; - virtex ) -AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS([virtex]);