What BSPs/architectures have you tested? Is this something that breaks on a per BSP basis? or per architecture basis? I am assuming that since it is linker based, each BSP could have broken linkcmds. Is that right?
--joel On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I checked in the support for linker sets ( > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2408). Please review the API > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/score/include/rtems/linkersets.h > > and documentation > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/doc/user/linkersets.t > > carefully. For an example please have a look at > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/sptests/splinkersets01 > > I will change the system initialization to use linker sets in the next > couple of weeks. Once this is done, the way back is not easy. So, now is > the best time to address potential issues. > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
