[PATCH 2/2] SPCONTEXT01: checks correct switching on and off of the Floating Point Unit

--- testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c b/testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c index 039dd63..3406367 100644 --- a/testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c +++ b/testsuites/sptests/spcontext0

[PATCH 1/2] SPARC Floating Point Context switch

two new Assembler Files for SPCONTEXT01 test on sparc 1) _CPU_Context_validate 2) _CPU_Context_volatile_clobber Update #2270. --- cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/Makefile.am | 2 + cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/rtems/score/cpu.h | 12 +- cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/sparc-context-validate.

Re: 4.11 Branching

Hello, is there anything left that prevents us to do the branch now? We can still do some work on the branch before we actually make the release. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47

Re: [PATCH 1/2] SPARC Floating Point Context switch

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Alexander Krutwig wrote: > two new Assembler Files for SPCONTEXT01 test on sparc > 1) _CPU_Context_validate > 2) _CPU_Context_volatile_clobber > > Update #2270. > --- > cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/Makefile.am | 2 + > cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/rtems/scor

Re: [PATCH 2/2] SPCONTEXT01: checks correct switching on and off of the Floating Point Unit

Should fp validation be a separate test from integer reg validation to ensure int-only works as expected? On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Alexander Krutwig wrote: > --- > testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/testsuites/sp

[PATCH] [RSB] Add support for building Epiphany tools

This patch adds support for building Epiphany tools. Currently the tools are fetched from Adapteva repositories. In the future, the tools should be fetched from GNU upstreams when Adapteva folks push their latest changes there. --- rtems/config/4.11/rtems-epiphany.bset | 43 ++

Re: 4.11 Branching

On 1/05/2015 12:11 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > is there anything left that prevents us to do the branch now? Just sorting out the actual procedure. We have not released using git before hmm did git exist when we lasted released .. ? > We can > still do some work on the branch before we a

Re: 4.11 Branching

On April 30, 2015 5:32:35 PM CDT, Chris Johns wrote: >On 1/05/2015 12:11 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >> is there anything left that prevents us to do the branch now? > >Just sorting out the actual procedure. We have not released using git >before hmm did git exist when we lasted released

Re: [PATCH] [RSB] Add support for building Epiphany tools

On 1/05/2015 7:31 am, Hesham ALMatary wrote: > +%source set binutils > https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb/archive/epiphany-binutils-2.23-software-cache.zip > +%source set gcc > https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-gcc/archive/epiphany-gcc-4.9.zip > +%source set gdb > https://gith