Should fp validation be a separate test from integer reg validation to ensure int-only works as expected?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Alexander Krutwig <alexander.krut...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > --- > testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c > b/testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c > index 039dd63..3406367 100644 > --- a/testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c > +++ b/testsuites/sptests/spcontext01/init.c > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void start_validate_task( > priority, > RTEMS_MINIMUM_STACK_SIZE, > RTEMS_DEFAULT_MODES, > - RTEMS_DEFAULT_ATTRIBUTES, > + RTEMS_FLOATING_POINT, > id > ); > rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL); > -- > 1.8.4.5 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
