I was confused

Hello, > I am sorry for the subject line, but I am so confused right now I couldn't > think of with a better one. Not anymore. Do you know how when you want to ask a perfect question, you find the answer yourself? Below is an excerpt from the make log. First line is obviously an invocation of

Re: I was confused

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Dominik Táborský wrote: > Hello, > >> I am sorry for the subject line, but I am so confused right now I couldn't >> think of with a better one. > Not anymore. Do you know how when you want to ask a perfect question, you > find the answer yourself? > > Below is an

Re: [PATCH] Add GPIO, I2C and SPI support for the RPi BSP

Sebastian, Makes sense. I think I understand the idea a little better now, we are using the linux uapi i2c API, but not the actual i2c bus and device driver implementations from linux, right? For the Pi ( and others like the Beagleboard ) we need to come up with an i2c BSP bus driver ( similar to

[PATCH] grspw: descriptor tables no longer statically allocated

From: Daniel Ramirez --- c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/shared/spw/grspw.c | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/shared/spw/grspw.c b/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/shared/spw/grspw.c index b311500..d3eb9b9 100644 --- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/

Re: [PATCH] grspw: descriptor tables no longer statically allocated

This is a patch proposed for PR 1761 [https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/1761]. Comment if OK or not. On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > From: Daniel Ramirez > > --- > c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/shared/spw/grspw.c | 14 +++--- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions