Re: Remaining BSP Build Failures + Adding "eth" linker script section for arm bsp.

2014-08-28 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 8/28/2014 4:27 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote: > Hello Chris and others, > > I am attaching the reply to BSP thread, because it fits more there. > > On Thursday 28 of August 2014 07:21:02 Chris Johns wrote: >> The number of BSPs building for ARM has exploded and for just the ARM >> architecture there are

Re: Remaining BSP Build Failures + Adding "eth" linker script section for arm bsp.

2014-08-28 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Chris and others, I am attaching the reply to BSP thread, because it fits more there. On Thursday 28 of August 2014 07:21:02 Chris Johns wrote: > The number of BSPs building for ARM has exploded and for just the ARM > architecture there are now 27,417 tests built. If I could run each test >

Re: Remaining BSP Build Failures

2014-08-27 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 8/27/2014 12:56 PM, Ric Claus wrote: > Thank you, Joel. I really appreciate it! No problem. I was initially concerned I was going to actually have to know something specific about the BSP. The BSP already had all the timing variables. It just didn't have the macro for the timer driver. I think

Re: Remaining BSP Build Failures

2014-08-27 Thread Ric Claus
Thank you, Joel. I really appreciate it! Ric On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I just fixed the virtex5. The missing code was pretty simple and > I just used the code from another BSP. That leaves: > > avr/avrtest: > GCC PR 62284 > nios2/nios2_iss: > Needs new toolset b

Re: Remaining BSP Build Failures

2014-08-27 Thread Joel Sherrill
I just fixed the virtex5. The missing code was pretty simple and I just used the code from another BSP. That leaves: avr/avrtest: GCC PR 62284 nios2/nios2_iss: Needs new toolset but binutils 2.20 has bug and won't assemble some code produced by gcc 4.9.1. Reported on binutils mailing list

Re: Remaining BSP Build Failures

2014-08-27 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 8/27/2014 11:34 AM, Ric Claus wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Sorry, but unfortunately I no longer have the ability or time to work on > Virtex5 since we moved to Zynqs. If someone else can't take it over, I think > you have no choice but to deprecate it. I understand. This may not be hard to rememb

Re: Remaining BSP Build Failures

2014-08-27 Thread Ric Claus
Hi Joel, Sorry, but unfortunately I no longer have the ability or time to work on Virtex5 since we moved to Zynqs. If someone else can't take it over, I think you have no choice but to deprecate it. Ric On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > Hesham.. or1k is mi

Re: Remaining BSP Build Failures

2014-08-27 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 8/27/2014 10:54 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Joel Sherrill > wrote: >> Hi >> >> Hesham.. or1k is missing a method. >> > Yes, I am aware of that, I will add missing methods just after I > submit another RSB patch for or1ksim. I figured you knew about it.

Re: Remaining BSP Build Failures

2014-08-27 Thread Hesham Moustafa
Hi, On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > Hesham.. or1k is missing a method. > Yes, I am aware of that, I will add missing methods just after I submit another RSB patch for or1ksim. > Ric.. any chance you can fix the virtex5 compile failure? > > Others please review and

Remaining BSP Build Failures

2014-08-27 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Hesham.. or1k is missing a method. Ric.. any chance you can fix the virtex5 compile failure? Others please review and see what you can help with. I attempted to build all BSPs over night with this configuration: ../rtems/configure --target=@CPU@-rtems4.11 \ --prefix=/home/joel/rtems-4.11