On 09/12/15 13:48, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/12/15 21:10, Sebastian Huber wrote:
- Am 8. Dez 2015 um 16:03 schrieb Joel Sherrill :
What BSPs/architectures have you tested?
I will test the with the attached patch tomorrow on all BSPs. This
patch adds a link time test to ticker.
On 08/12/15 21:10, Sebastian Huber wrote:
- Am 8. Dez 2015 um 16:03 schrieb Joel Sherrill :
What BSPs/architectures have you tested?
I will test the with the attached patch tomorrow on all BSPs. This
patch adds a link time test to ticker. This test verifies that the
linker comman
- Am 8. Dez 2015 um 21:24 schrieb Joel Sherrill j...@rtems.org:
> Sorry. I didn't see that patch get committed this morning and didn't realize
> it addressed the issue. When you said, BSPs needed to use linkcmds.base
> and not cut and paste, I took that to mean you hadn't touched any other
>
Sorry. I didn't see that patch get committed this morning and didn't realize
it addressed the issue. When you said, BSPs needed to use linkcmds.base
and not cut and paste, I took that to mean you hadn't touched any other
BSPs.
I will try to test some on BSPs you didn't.
Is the ticker addition jus
- Am 8. Dez 2015 um 16:03 schrieb Joel Sherrill :
> What BSPs/architectures have you tested?
I will test the with the attached patch tomorrow on all BSPs. This patch adds a
link time test to ticker. This test verifies that the linker command file
modifications for the RTEMS linker sets are
Hello Joel,
before you start with wild guessing, please look at the patch:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=b618d8cfc54f84d4ed03dc7b7fa510c872e6128a
- Am 8. Dez 2015 um 16:45 schrieb Joel Sherrill :
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-bra
We can also route student questions to here if we don't know the answers.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Se
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>>
> >>> What BSPs/architectures have you tested?
> >>
> >>
> >
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
>>> What BSPs/architectures have you tested?
>>
>>
>> I temporarily moved the splinkersets01 test to the samples/ticker and
>> tes
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> What BSPs/architectures have you tested?
>>
>
> I temporarily moved the splinkersets01 test to the samples/ticker and
> tested that all BSPs build and link th
On 08/12/15 16:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Is this something that breaks on a per BSP basis? or per architecture
basis?
I am assuming that since it is linker based, each BSP could have
broken linkcmds.
Is that right?
It breaks on a per linker command file basis. Since all the maintained
BSP
On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote:
What BSPs/architectures have you tested?
I temporarily moved the splinkersets01 test to the samples/ticker and
tested that all BSPs build and link this test.
I executed the splinkersets01 test on sis, psim and
arm_realview_pbx_a9_qemu.
Is this som
What BSPs/architectures have you tested?
Is this something that breaks on a per BSP basis? or per architecture basis?
I am assuming that since it is linker based, each BSP could have broken
linkcmds.
Is that right?
--joel
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded
13 matches
Mail list logo
