On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Alan Cudmore wrote:
> Chris: The Model B V1.2 should work fine.
>
> I think I have one of each model Raspberry Pi, so I could test just about
> any Pi code.
> I just got my development environment up to date and tested the single core
> Pi ( A+ ) and Pi Zero. I ver
Chris: The Model B V1.2 should work fine.
I think I have one of each model Raspberry Pi, so I could test just about
any Pi code.
I just got my development environment up to date and tested the single core
Pi ( A+ ) and Pi Zero. I verified 4.11 and 4.12 work.
I also updated my RKI image ( github.co
On 27/04/2016 18:53, Pavel Pisa wrote:
I can help in this area but I have only RPi 1 for testing now.
I have a Model B - V1.2. Is this ok?
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello everybody
and especially those who want to work on RPi.
Before this sound of GSoC start, we should think
what should be integrated from YANG Qiao patches.
If you expect that mailbox services would be required
to access VideoCore and boot data then I think
that YANG Qiao work is valuable and
CCing Andre.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Martin Galvan
wrote:
> Hi everyone! Just wanted to check on the status for this project. I
> saw it was accepted for the GSoC 2016 (congratulations Mudit!), and
> would like to know what our workflow will be like. I offered to
> co-mentor it and help
Hello All,
I am very sorry for the late response. I have my exams starting this week,
until the end of the month. I should be able to contribute full-time to the
project during my vacations after the exam.
I have made changes to the document to provide more details about my
approach and deliverab
Hi Vivek,
Awesome progress! Sorry if I missed this, but do you have a GitHub repository,
or some location where we can take a look at your work? I'm excited to see what
changes you've made, even if they are not final yet.
Isaac
On 04/02/2016 10:30 AM, vivek kukreja wrote:
Hi Joel
Sorry for
Hi Joel
Sorry for the delay in responding and thank you for your comments on my
proposal.
I would like to share my progress so far. I ran the fileio trace example as
described on the Trace Buffering page and started studying rtems-tld. I made
changes so that rtems-tld command auto-generates a
Hi Marcos and all,
As you suggested me I took StarterWare as reference and writing
function prototypes. I hosted my blog for PWM driver development
tracking so I can note down my day to day work and you can easily read
in which direction I am working.
I will update this frequently. You can visit
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:08 AM, punit vara wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:13 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:09 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Marcos Díaz
>>> wrote:
Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
Hi everyone,
I would be like to fine tune my application.
The link to my proposal is as follows :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ajhs7op7vLUYFeVZnjAaIhB2CNawvhQOMVtGtivOUtg/edit#
It would be great if people could provide me insights/constructive
criticism.
Thanks
Mudit
On Mar 26, 2016 3:47
Hi all,
I had completed the GSoC application successfully and also the basic setup
of the RTEMS environment ready.
A big thanks to everyone who gave me inputs even though it I applied at the
last moment. :)
The link to my proposal is as follows :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ajhs7op7vLUYF
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Great! Remember today is the deadline to get the Google application in with
> the PDF of your proposal. Do your best and we will work to fine tune it
> assuming you meet the Google deadline.
>
Not just today, but I think it is in 2.5 hours o
Great! Remember today is the deadline to get the Google application in with
the PDF of your proposal. Do your best and we will work to fine tune it
assuming you meet the Google deadline.
Please update the table of students (you need a Trac/wiki account to do
this) and include a link to your propos
OK, that should be a good set for your proposal. I'm not sure what the
status is for Pi2 now. It may need some cleanup. Make sure you get
your final PDF and enrollment submitted today.
Please keep devel on any emails of non-private nature.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Mudit Jain wrote:
> Hi
For prior effort on SD card see
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015/RaspberryPi_peripherals_and_SD_card#SDcardsupport
There is another student that is planning to add USB/NIC support. You
would be best served to avoid too much overlap, but if you go for a
different RPi model that may not matter
Hi,
With the help from Rock members, I could secure some scripts and
documentation from the previous SOCIS project on Porting Rock on RTEMS.
That caused a lot many changes in my proposal.I request everyone to have a
look and comment. My proposal link is
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ntfj3X4
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:13 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:09 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Marcos Díaz
>> wrote:
>>> Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
>>> beagle bone. You can base your work with it.
>>>
>>> On Tue,
On 21/03/16 15:55, Rahul Goradia wrote:
Is there any other open project related to resource management or
scheduling in which I can contribute?
Due to the SMP work in progress I don't think any resource management or
scheduling related topics are suitable as a GSoC project this year with
the
Thanks for the prompt reply.
Is there any other open project related to resource management or
scheduling in which I can contribute?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> They are already implemented, but since there is currently no use ca
Will implementation of phase fair RW locks be considered in this GSOC?
I know I am very late to ask this question.
I have read the concept and theory of phase fair RW locks from reference
suggested in RTEMS( http://www.mpi-sws.org/~bbb/papers/pdf/rtsj11.pdf)
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Sebas
They are already implemented, but since there is currently no use case
for them, they are not included in the sources.
On 21/03/16 15:29, Rahul Goradia wrote:
Will implementation of phase fair RW locks be considered in this GSOC?
I know I am very late to ask this question.
I have read the conce
On 19/03/16 02:35, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Павел Мовчан wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I want to work with RTEMS and do some work for it.
>I find SMP and "Condition Variables"(status?) is very interesting for me. I
SMP is moving fast right now. Sebastian Huber may have mo
Hi Chris, Isaac
I implemented a C program as Isaac said to parse and understand an example CTF
trace stream based on an input config. It was really helpful to understand the
overall CTF structure. Now im looking at the Capture Engine code to understand
how concurrent buffering is supported and
I have a fundamental question. Is Rock the main issue, or does the
Orocos port that uses RTEMS also need to be updated and verified? Can
you run Orocos/RTEMS?
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> You need to register an account on the wiki, and then edit the page
> (link at bott
You need to register an account on the wiki, and then edit the page
(link at bottom).
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Sambeet Panigrahi
wrote:
> Hi
> I am attaching the link to my proposal with this mail This is not a final
> draft and there's a lot of scope of improvement. I have not yet decid
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Marcos Díaz
wrote:
> Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
> beagle bone. You can base your work with it.
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Marcos Díaz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 1
include statement at the earliest.
Regards,
Vivek
From: Chris Johns
Sent: 16 March 2016 10:18
To: Vivek Kukreja; guteku...@gmail.com
Cc: Gedare Bloom
Subject: Re: GSoC 2016 Interested in Tracing was Re:
Hi,
I have reviewed your document but I could no actual pro
if the error in
>> the fileio tracing example is resolved and send a patch for the
>> missing include statement at the earliest.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vivek
>>
>>
>> From: Chris Johns
>> Sent: 16 March 2
Vivek
From: Chris Johns
Sent: 16 March 2016 10:18
To: Vivek Kukreja; guteku...@gmail.com
Cc: Gedare Bloom
Subject: Re: GSoC 2016 Interested in Tracing was Re:
Hi,
I have reviewed your document but I could no actual proposal in the
Google Document https://goo.gl/8jRfyV.
I have updated the pro
Vivek
From: Chris Johns
Sent: 16 March 2016 10:18
To: Vivek Kukreja; guteku...@gmail.com
Cc: Gedare Bloom
Subject: Re: GSoC 2016 Interested in Tracing was Re:
Hi,
I have reviewed your document but I could no actual proposal in the
Google Document https://goo.gl/8jRfyV.
I have updated the pro
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:09 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Marcos Díaz
> wrote:
>> Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
>> beagle bone. You can base your work with it.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Marcos Díaz
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Павел Мовчан wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to work with RTEMS and do some work for it.
> I find SMP and "Condition Variables"(status?) is very interesting for me. I
SMP is moving fast right now. Sebastian Huber may have more to say on
whether anything is worth try
Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
beagle bone. You can base your work with it.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Marcos Díaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:24 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:24 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:07 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 AM, punit vara wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
>
>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:24 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:07 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 AM, punit vara wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:07 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 AM, punit vara wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah wrote:
Hello Punit and all,
According to me, Punit
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 AM, punit vara wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Punit and all,
>>>
>>> According to me, Punit you must have completed some gpio test through gpio
>>> API that
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Joel should comment on this. He has been making a recent effort at
> unifying the PCI implementations in the BSP layer. However, we also
> have the new "drvmgr" framework in cpukit/libdrvmgr that supports PCI
> plus a lot of other devices an
Joel should comment on this. He has been making a recent effort at
unifying the PCI implementations in the BSP layer. However, we also
have the new "drvmgr" framework in cpukit/libdrvmgr that supports PCI
plus a lot of other devices and busses.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:19 PM, animesh pathak wrot
Sorry, I clicked on Reply by mistake instead of Reply All. Here is an offline
exchange with Chris.
---
On 10/03/2016 06:39, Vivek Kukreja wrote:
> Hello Chris, Isaac
> I have run the modified hello world example and created a patch for it. I
> cannot access your git server from my institute pro
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Punit and all,
>>
>> According to me, Punit you must have completed some gpio test through
>> gpio API that was merged last year. So till the final result of accepted
>> student
Hi,
Thanks for informing. Another interesting idea on which I would like to
work upon, from the Ideas page is "Unified Interrupts and Devices" . In
case this project is already assigned to someone please suggest me the
project which I can pick up, and can get started with.
Regarding my skills, I ha
Hi Animesh,
I think the condition variables will be fixed by another developer
(Sebastian Huber). Any other projects catch your eye?
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 5:31 AM, animesh pathak wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am Animesh Chandra Pathak.
> I am pursuing my BTech in Computer Science at IIIT Hyderab
On 07/03/2016 10:25, Chris Johns wrote:
For this to happen I would like to see a separate GCC
Plug-In project started and trace support being just one part of it.
To clarify I mean a project within RTEMS for RTEMS.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@
Hi,
Please excuse the delay in responding.
Trace doco has been placed in the wiki here
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Tracing. It outlines the overall
structure of the tracing support we have. The key component is the trace
linker. The purpose of the trace linker is to capture in a si
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah wrote:
> Hello Punit and all,
>
> According to me, Punit you must have completed some gpio test through gpio
> API that was merged last year. So till the final result of accepted student
> you can start working with PWM driver that plays an important rol
Hello Punit and all,
According to me, Punit you must have completed some gpio test through gpio
API that was merged last year. So till the final result of accepted student
you can start working with PWM driver that plays an important role for any
embedded project. This would be a good kick-start f
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Pratik Singhal wrote:
> Hello, I am Pratik Singhal 3rd year undergraduate student studying Computer
> Science in India.
> I am interested in working with RTEMS on improving support for Raspberry Pi
> boards as a part of Google summer of code 2016 project.
>
We use I2c but using drivers from TI's baremetal drivers they provide in
their StarterWare software suite.
So, currently we cannot commit that into RTEMS.
But those drivers should be very useful to port to RTEMS.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2
Hi Vivek,
Chris is definitely the person most knowledgeable in this area.
On 03/03/2016 11:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Vivek Kukreja mailto:vivekkukr...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Hi everyone
I am Vivek Kukreja, currently pursuing Masters from India.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 05:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On the POSIX Compliance, I have some work in progress that needs to be
>> submitted
>> so don't starting coding without chatting with us. Plenty to do so no
>> worries, just
>> coordination n
On 03/03/2016 05:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On the POSIX Compliance, I have some work in progress that needs to be
submitted
so don't starting coding without chatting with us. Plenty to do so no
worries, just
coordination needed.
As part of defining the work on that project, we will have to help
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Marcos Díaz <
marcos.d...@tallertechnologies.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>
>>> Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and
>>> GPIO BS
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, punit vara wrote:
>
>> Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and GPIO
>> BSP . It seems SPI,USB BSP need to be developed as I have checked rtems.git
>> and I am not sure about I2
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, punit vara wrote:
>
>> Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and GPIO
>> BSP . It seems SPI,USB BSP need to be developed as I have checked rtems.git
>> and I am not sure about I2
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, punit vara wrote:
> Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and GPIO
> BSP . It seems SPI,USB BSP need to be developed as I have checked rtems.git
> and I am not sure about I2C .I asked last year student Ketul .According to
> him , I2c is a
I am interested in following projects apart from BBB BSP :
1. Improve Posix compliance
2. TCP/IP stack update (Please suggest me more readings for this)
What are the prerequisites I need to do to improve my chances ? please let
me know.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Hesham Almatary
wrote:
Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and GPIO
BSP . It seems SPI,USB BSP need to be developed as I have checked rtems.git
and I am not sure about I2C .I asked last year student Ketul .According to
him , I2c is also need to be modified. I tried to contact Ben but he is
un
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> Hi Punit,
>
> You can have a look at the open projects here [1] and find one or more
> that match your experience/interests.
>
> [1] https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/OpenProjects
>
>
I have added Ben Gras. He knows more about the BBB
Hi Punit,
You can have a look at the open projects here [1] and find one or more
that match your experience/interests.
[1] https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/OpenProjects
Regards,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:14 PM, punit vara wrote:
> I have asked for BBB BSP proposal before but I haven't fo
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> ok, please discuss further with Joel, as he is the primary mentor for
> that project.
>
> +1
But now that we have someone interested, I would like to order the possible
things to tackle with you.
Some of them are newlib and we can possibly
ok, please discuss further with Joel, as he is the primary mentor for
that project.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Viktoriya Vasiliev
wrote:
> Hello Gedare,
>
>
>>
>> Welcome to RTEMS! You should see our Getting Started guide especially
>> oriented toward GSoC students, at
>> https://devel.rtems
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Viktoriya Vasiliev <
viktoriyavasil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Gedare,
>
>
>
>> Welcome to RTEMS! You should see our Getting Started guide especially
>> oriented toward GSoC students, at
>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/GettingStarted
>>
>> Please note the cu
Hello Gedare,
> Welcome to RTEMS! You should see our Getting Started guide especially
> oriented toward GSoC students, at
> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/GettingStarted
>
> Please note the current master branch of RTEMS is now version 4.12, so
> adjust any use of 4.11 to be 4.12 when working
Gedare,
I will be happy to be mentor if a suitable project gets picked.
wkr,
Thomas.
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Gedare Bloom"
An: us...@rtems.org, "rtems-de...@rtems.org"
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2016 16:51:58
Betreff: GSOC 2016: Call for Mentors
Potential GSoC Mentors,
Pl
Hi Viktoriya,
Welcome to RTEMS! You should see our Getting Started guide especially
oriented toward GSoC students, at
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/GettingStarted
Please note the current master branch of RTEMS is now version 4.12, so
adjust any use of 4.11 to be 4.12 when working with 'master
67 matches
Mail list logo
