On Fri, Feb 1, 2019, 7:04 AM Alan Cudmore I would like to see both R5 and A53 support. Having RTEMS on the R5 could
> allow it to be used for OpenAMP communication with the A53. Normally the
> OpenAMP port for the Xilinx board uses bare metal or FreeRTOS on the R5.
>
+1
> For the A53, is there
On 01/02/2019 15:04, Alan Cudmore wrote:
For the A53, is there a reason for choosing Aarch32 vs Aarch64 for the
RTEMS port?
The AArch64 is a new architecture. For the AArch32 we can hopefully use
the existing stuff from the ARM port.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornie
I would like to see both R5 and A53 support. Having RTEMS on the R5 could
allow it to be used for OpenAMP communication with the A53. Normally the
OpenAMP port for the Xilinx board uses bare metal or FreeRTOS on the R5.
For the A53, is there a reason for choosing Aarch32 vs Aarch64 for the
RTEMS p
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:34 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we will very likely soon work a BSP for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+
> MPSoC platform:
>
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3682
>
> Please let me know, if you are interested in support for the C
On 23/01/2019 15:11, emanuel stiebler wrote:
Please let me know, if you are interested in support for the Cortex-R5
processors or AArch64 mode.
I think, the AARch64 is more rewarding, as the R5 should be easy
afterwards (same peripherals(?)).
And I think we discussed it already before, the big
On 2019-01-23 03:34, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we will very likely soon work a BSP for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+
> MPSoC platform:
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3682
Excellent!
> Please let me know, if you are interested in support for the Cortex-R5
> processors or AArch64 mode.
