Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] shell: Document i2c and spi commands.

Am 01.12.20 um 13:45 schrieb Peter Dufault: On Nov 30, 2020, at 18:07 , Gedare Bloom wrote: Aren't nearly all shell commands at least a bit unsafe? And we don't have a lot of commands that have to be explicitly turned on if CONFIGURE_SHELL_COMMANDS_ALL is already set. I found only networking

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] shell: Document i2c and spi commands.

> On Nov 30, 2020, at 18:07 , Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Aren't nearly all shell commands at least a bit unsafe? And we don't > have a lot of commands that have to be explicitly turned on if > CONFIGURE_SHELL_COMMANDS_ALL is already set. I found only networking > commands. > > That seems accurate

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] shell: Document i2c and spi commands.

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:14 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Hello Gedare, > > thanks for the review. > > On 30/11/2020 18:43, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:14 AM Christian Mauderer > > > > wrote: > > > > --- > >

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] shell: Document i2c and spi commands.

Hello Gedare, thanks for the review. On 30/11/2020 18:43, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:14 AM Christian Mauderer > wrote: ---  shell/general_commands.rst | 200 +  1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] shell: Document i2c and spi commands.

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:14 AM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > --- > shell/general_commands.rst | 200 + > 1 file changed, 200 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/shell/general_commands.rst b/shell/general_commands.rst > index c