I've applied the patch and will run the tests. If OK, then I should be
pushing soon.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I'm having trouble standing up a sparc-rtems5/erc32 build right now,
> so I can't test this.
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
I'm having trouble standing up a sparc-rtems5/erc32 build right now,
so I can't test this.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> This looks fine to me, and I'll commit after I can test it. (We
>> currently don't ap
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This looks fine to me, and I'll commit after I can test it. (We
> currently don't apply any significance to --signed-off-by in RTEMS
> Project.) I'm investigating your inquiry on the 0/1 cover letter.
>
I am ok with it if it tests OK with y
This looks fine to me, and I'll commit after I can test it. (We
currently don't apply any significance to --signed-off-by in RTEMS
Project.) I'm investigating your inquiry on the 0/1 cover letter.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Martin Erik Werner
wrote:
> _Timespec_Equal_to() does not set errno
