I've applied the patch and will run the tests. If OK, then I should be
pushing soon.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> I'm having trouble standing up a sparc-rtems5/erc32 build right now,
> so I can't test this.
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> This looks fine to me, and I'll commit after I can test it. (We
> >> currently don't apply any significance to --signed-off-by in RTEMS
> >> Project.) I'm investigating your inquiry on the 0/1 cover letter.
> >
> >
> > I am ok with it if it tests OK with you.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Martin Erik Werner
> >> <martinerikwerner....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > _Timespec_Equal_to() does not set errno, hence avoid using perror(),
> >> > instead use fprintf() to stderr, and extend the error message to
> provide
> >> > information about what the error is (measured timer value after
> >> > re-arming is not equal to the configured interval), and how large of a
> >> > difference was measured.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Martin Erik Werner <martin.wer...@aacmicrotec.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer01/psxtimer.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> >> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer01/psxtimer.c
> >> > b/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer01/psxtimer.c
> >> > index 032e9f8e6c..6ec049ac54 100644
> >> > --- a/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer01/psxtimer.c
> >> > +++ b/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer01/psxtimer.c
> >> > @@ -143,7 +143,12 @@ void * task_a (void *arg)
> >> > rtems_test_exit(0);
> >> > }
> >> > if (! _Timespec_Equal_to( &timerdata.it_value, &my_period )){
> >> > - perror ("Error in Task A timer_gettime\n");
> >> > + fprintf(
> >> > + stderr, "Error in Task A timer_gettime:\n"
> >> > + " re-armed timer: %" PRIdtime_t ":%ld does not match
> >> > interval: %" PRIdtime_t ":%ld\n",
> >> > + timerdata.it_value.tv_sec, timerdata.it_value.tv_nsec,
> >> > + my_period.tv_sec, my_period.tv_nsec
> >> > + );
> >> > }
> >> > clock = time(NULL);
> >> > printf("Executing task A with count = %2i %s", params->count,
> >> > ctime(&clock));
> >> > @@ -291,7 +296,12 @@ void * task_c (void *arg)
> >> > rtems_test_exit(0);
> >> > }
> >> > if (! _Timespec_Equal_to( &timerdata.it_value, &my_period) ){
> >> > - perror ("Error in Task C timer_gettime\n");
> >> > + fprintf(
> >> > + stderr, "Error in Task A timer_gettime:\n"
> >> > + " re-armed timer: %" PRIdtime_t ":%ld does not match
> >> > interval: %" PRIdtime_t ":%ld\n",
> >> > + timerdata.it_value.tv_sec, timerdata.it_value.tv_nsec,
> >> > + my_period.tv_sec, my_period.tv_nsec
> >> > + );
> >> > }
> >> > pthread_mutex_lock (&data.mutex);
> >> > while (data.updated == FALSE) {
> >> > --
> >> > 2.11.0
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > devel mailing list
> >> > devel@rtems.org
> >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> devel@rtems.org
> >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
