Re: [PATCH] tester: Expand special case for minimum.exe

2021-05-26 Thread Chris Johns
On 27/5/21 2:04 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: > On 5/26/2021 19:22, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 27/5/21 12:06 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> On Wed, May 26, 2021, 7:03 PM Chris Johns >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 26/5/21 1:52 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: >>> > The minimum.exe test case

Re: [PATCH] tester: Expand special case for minimum.exe

2021-05-26 Thread Kinsey Moore
On 5/26/2021 19:22, Chris Johns wrote: On 27/5/21 12:06 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2021, 7:03 PM Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: On 26/5/21 1:52 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > The minimum.exe test case is expected to fail as an "invalid" test in > the tester

Re: [PATCH] tester: Expand special case for minimum.exe

2021-05-26 Thread Chris Johns
On 27/5/21 12:06 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021, 7:03 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 26/5/21 1:52 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > The minimum.exe test case is expected to fail as an "invalid" test in > > the tester since it is completely stripped

Re: [PATCH] tester: Expand special case for minimum.exe

2021-05-26 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, May 26, 2021, 7:03 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 26/5/21 1:52 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > The minimum.exe test case is expected to fail as an "invalid" test in > > the tester since it is completely stripped down and does not output the > > normal test header and footer. When fatal error dete

Re: [PATCH] tester: Expand special case for minimum.exe

2021-05-26 Thread Chris Johns
On 26/5/21 1:52 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > The minimum.exe test case is expected to fail as an "invalid" test in > the tester since it is completely stripped down and does not output the > normal test header and footer. When fatal error detection support was > added, this caught minimum.exe and star