On 26/5/21 1:52 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > The minimum.exe test case is expected to fail as an "invalid" test in > the tester since it is completely stripped down and does not output the > normal test header and footer. When fatal error detection support was > added, this caught minimum.exe and started flagging it as "fatal" > instead of "invalid". The special-case detection of minimum.exe only > matched on "invalid" results and not "fatal" results and so began > flagging minimum.exe as an actual failure.> > This change adds the special-case handling to the "fatal" test state > handling.
Is this the right solution? Is minimum.exe suppose to run and not fail? It would seem easy to make a minimum.exe with nothing in it, ie minimal, that seems to pass. It would make great marketing material. What happens if minimum fails? I feel minimum needs to be able to run and not fail to be a valid minimum. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
